Eltrombopag as second line treatment in patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia: A single center real life experience

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Eltrombopag as second line treatment in patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia: A single center real life experience
المؤلفون: Francesca Guidotti, Luciana Ambrosiani, Angelo Gardellini, Michelle Zancanella, Mauro Turrini, Maddalena Feltri, Elena Maino
المصدر: Blood Cells, Molecules, and Diseases. 92:102620
بيانات النشر: Elsevier BV, 2021.
سنة النشر: 2021
مصطلحات موضوعية: Adult, Male, medicine.medical_specialty, medicine.medical_treatment, Splenectomy, Eltrombopag, Azathioprine, Single Center, Benzoates, Young Adult, chemistry.chemical_compound, medicine, Humans, Glucocorticoids, Molecular Biology, Aged, Retrospective Studies, Aged, 80 and over, Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic, Romiplostim, medicine.diagnostic_test, business.industry, Cell Biology, Hematology, Middle Aged, Surgery, Discontinuation, Bone marrow examination, Hydrazines, Treatment Outcome, chemistry, Pyrazoles, Molecular Medicine, Female, Rituximab, business, Receptors, Thrombopoietin, medicine.drug
الوصف: Glucocorticoid treatment is the standard initial therapy for patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Despite a rate of 60-80% of initial remissions, only 30 to 50% of adults have a sustained response after discontinuation. Second line options are splenectomy, thrombopoietin-receptor agonists (TPO-RAs), rituximab and intravenous immunoglobulin. Third line treatments include a mix of immunosuppressive drugs (e.g. azathioprine, ciclosporin, etc.). Recently international guidelines have proposed a treatment algorithm formalizing TPO-RAs and splenectomy as second and third line respectively, confirming splenectomy as second line choice only in emergency. Here we present a single center observational retrospective study of eltrombopag as second line treatment. We evaluated 48 adult primary chronic ITP patients since 2003. Forty-four out of 48 patients received a first line treatment with glucocorticoids. Twenty-two (61%) patients needed a second line treatment: 18 received eltrombopag, 3 a second course of steroid and one patient underwent splenectomy. Every patient before starting eltrombopag or receiving splenectomy underwent bone marrow examination. Overall response rate to eltrombopag was 94% with a CR rate of 76% and a PR of 23%; only one patient was non responder, underwent splenectomy and received subsequent treatment with rituximab, romiplostim and cyclosporin obtaining CR. One patient developed an autoimmune pancytopenia about a month after starting TPO-RA and in addition to eltrombopag received steroid and rituximab with blood count improvement. After a median follow up of 21,1 months (range 0,4-64,7 months) 16 patients (89%) are still on therapy maintaining response. As regards safety, gastrointestinal side effects were rare and low grade; only one patient discontinued eltrombopag after few weeks, because of dizziness. One patient had a relapse of deep venous thrombosis while no major bleeding complications were observed. Our real-life single center experience confirms efficacy and safety of eltrombopag as second line treatment in chronic ITP patients.
تدمد: 1079-9796
URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::ec4c2f78a2d2103f8adb834905b3e299
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcmd.2021.102620
حقوق: CLOSED
رقم الأكسشن: edsair.doi.dedup.....ec4c2f78a2d2103f8adb834905b3e299
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE