Shear Bond Strength of Different CAD/CAM Ceramics: Acid vs Er:YAG Laser Etching

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Shear Bond Strength of Different CAD/CAM Ceramics: Acid vs Er:YAG Laser Etching
المؤلفون: Jingmei Li, Yepo Hou, Renze Shen, Yi Chen, Luyuan Chen, Jie Gao, Yingtong Jiang
المصدر: Photomedicine and Laser Surgery. 36:614-620
بيانات النشر: Mary Ann Liebert Inc, 2018.
سنة النشر: 2018
مصطلحات موضوعية: Ceramics, Materials science, genetic structures, Surface Properties, Biomedical Engineering, Laser etching, Lasers, Solid-State, macromolecular substances, Hydrofluoric Acid, 030207 dermatology & venereal diseases, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Acid Etching, Dental, stomatognathic system, Etching (microfabrication), Materials Testing, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging, Ceramic, Composite material, Acid etching, fungi, technology, industry, and agriculture, 030206 dentistry, Dental Porcelain, Shear bond, visual_art, Dental Etching, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, visual_art.visual_art_medium, Computer-Aided Design, Aluminum Silicates, Shear Strength, Er:YAG laser
الوصف: To evaluate whether Er:YAG laser etching could be an alternative surface treatment to hydrofluoric (HF) acid etching.Surface treatment is important to bonding properties and utility times of computer aided design/computer aided manufacture (CAD/CAM) dental ceramics. The traditional method of HF acid etching is harmful to humans if not handled properly.Four different CAD/CAM ceramics (Vita Mark II, IPS Empress CAD, IPS e.max CAD, and Vita Enamic) were cut into 72 blocks and divided into 6 groups according to different surface treatments (n = 12): Group A: no treatment; Group B: HF acid; and Group C to F: different Er:YAG laser power settings (300, 400, 500, and 600 mJ). Ten blocks of each group were measured for shear bond strength (SBS) and the failure modes were evaluated; the rest blocks were observed by scanning electronic microscopy (SEM).HF acid etching resulted in the highest SBS for Vita Mark II, IPS Empress CAD, and Vita Enamic; however, the difference was not statistically significant (p 0.05) compared to the second highest group of laser with 600 mJ in IPS Empress CAD. For IPS e.max CAD, the highest SBS was obtained from laser group with 400 mJ. The SBS results were consistent with failure modes and surface characterizations in SEM images.Our results showed that Er:YAG laser had little impact on Vita Mark II and Vita Enamic; but proper power settings could be an alternative surface treatment to HF acid etching (600 mJ for IPS Empress CAD and 400 mJ for IPS e.max CAD).
تدمد: 1557-8550
URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::fb2ccae88b57082b1273696eac09ae27
https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2018.4475
حقوق: CLOSED
رقم الأكسشن: edsair.doi.dedup.....fb2ccae88b57082b1273696eac09ae27
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE