The present paper highlights the main differences between Consteel® and conventional EAF technologiesregarding scheduled and unscheduled maintenance practices. The study has been made on the basis of datacollected in plants with high maintenance standards and more than 10 years of operational experience.These data have been analyzed and organized in a comparison table where they have been associated with therelevant maintenance costs. The comparison shows that the Consteel® technology achieves a significantreduction in the overall maintenance costs compared to a conventional EAF.
