Recommendations for stereotactic body radiation therapy for spine and non-spine bone metastases. A GETUG (French society of urological radiation oncolgists) consensus using a national two-round modified Delphi survey

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Recommendations for stereotactic body radiation therapy for spine and non-spine bone metastases. A GETUG (French society of urological radiation oncolgists) consensus using a national two-round modified Delphi survey
المؤلفون: F, Vilotte, D, Pasquier, P, Blanchard, S, Supiot, J, Khalifa, U, Schick, T, Lacornerie, L, Vieillevigne, D, Marre, O, Chapet, I, Latorzeff, N, Magne, E, Meyer, K, Cao, Y, Belkacemi, J E, Bibault, M, Berge-Lefranc, J C, Faivre, K, Gnep, V, Guimas, A, Hasbini, J, Langrand-Escure, C, Hennequin, P, Graff
المصدر: Clinical and translational radiation oncology. 37
سنة النشر: 2022
الوصف: The relevance of metastasis-directed stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) remains to be demonstrated through phase III trials. Multiple SBRT procedures have been published potentially resulting in a disparity of practices. Therefore, the french society of urological radiation oncolgists (GETUG) recognized the need for joint expert consensus guidelines for metastasis-directed SBRT in order to standardize practice in trials carried out by the group.After a comprehensive literature review, 97 recommendation statements were created regarding planning and delivery of spine bone (SBM) and non-spine bone metastases (NSBM) SBRT. These statements were then submitted to a national online two-round modified Delphi survey among main GETUG investigators. Consensus was achieved if a statement received ≥ 75 % agreements, a trend to consensus being defined as 65-74 % agreements. Any statement without consensus at round one was re-submitted in round two.Twenty-one out of 29 (72.4%) surveyed experts responded to both rounds. Seventy-five statements achieved consensus at round one leaving 22 statements needing a revote of which 16 achieved consensus and 5 a trend to consensus. The final rate of consensus was 91/97 (93.8%). Statements with no consensus concerned patient selection (3/19), dose and fractionation (1/11), prescription and dose objectives (1/9) and organs at risk delineation (1/15). The voting resulted in the writing of step-by-step consensus guidelines.Consensus guidelines for SBM and NSBM SBRT were agreed upon using a validated modified Delphi approach. These guidelines will be used as per-protocole recommendations in ongoing and further GETUG clinical trials.
تدمد: 2405-6308
URL الوصول: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=pmid________::0ba080a27cb3fa5e05795ac1e05da470
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36052019
حقوق: OPEN
رقم الأكسشن: edsair.pmid..........0ba080a27cb3fa5e05795ac1e05da470
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE