The AI Review Lottery: Widespread AI-Assisted Peer Reviews Boost Paper Scores and Acceptance Rates

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: The AI Review Lottery: Widespread AI-Assisted Peer Reviews Boost Paper Scores and Acceptance Rates
المؤلفون: Latona, Giuseppe Russo, Ribeiro, Manoel Horta, Davidson, Tim R., Veselovsky, Veniamin, West, Robert
سنة النشر: 2024
المجموعة: Computer Science
مصطلحات موضوعية: Computer Science - Computers and Society
الوصف: Journals and conferences worry that peer reviews assisted by artificial intelligence (AI), in particular, large language models (LLMs), may negatively influence the validity and fairness of the peer-review system, a cornerstone of modern science. In this work, we address this concern with a quasi-experimental study of the prevalence and impact of AI-assisted peer reviews in the context of the 2024 International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), a large and prestigious machine-learning conference. Our contributions are threefold. Firstly, we obtain a lower bound for the prevalence of AI-assisted reviews at ICLR 2024 using the GPTZero LLM detector, estimating that at least $15.8\%$ of reviews were written with AI assistance. Secondly, we estimate the impact of AI-assisted reviews on submission scores. Considering pairs of reviews with different scores assigned to the same paper, we find that in $53.4\%$ of pairs the AI-assisted review scores higher than the human review ($p = 0.002$; relative difference in probability of scoring higher: $+14.4\%$ in favor of AI-assisted reviews). Thirdly, we assess the impact of receiving an AI-assisted peer review on submission acceptance. In a matched study, submissions near the acceptance threshold that received an AI-assisted peer review were $4.9$ percentage points ($p = 0.024$) more likely to be accepted than submissions that did not. Overall, we show that AI-assisted reviews are consequential to the peer-review process and offer a discussion on future implications of current trends
Comment: Manoel Horta Ribeiro, Tim R. Davidson, and Veniamin Veselovsky contributed equally to this work
نوع الوثيقة: Working Paper
URL الوصول: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.02150
رقم الأكسشن: edsarx.2405.02150
قاعدة البيانات: arXiv