A counterexample to conjecture 'Catch 22' with 3 players, and 5 outcomes: 2 terminal and 3 cyclic

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: A counterexample to conjecture 'Catch 22' with 3 players, and 5 outcomes: 2 terminal and 3 cyclic
المؤلفون: Butyrin, Bogdan, Gurvich, Vladimir, Lutsenko, Anton, Naumova, Mariya, Peskin, Maxim
سنة النشر: 2024
المجموعة: Mathematics
مصطلحات موضوعية: Mathematics - Combinatorics
الوصف: We construct a finite deterministic graphical (DG) game without Nash equilibria in pure stationary strategies. This game has 3 players $I=\{1,2,3\}$ and 5 outcomes: 2 terminal $a_1$ and $a_2$ and 3 cyclic. Furthermore, for 2 players a terminal outcome is the best: $a_1$ for player 3 and $a_2$ for player 1. Hence, the rank vector $r$ is at most $(1,2,1)$. Here $r_i$ is the number of terminal outcomes that are worse than some cyclic outcome for the player $i \in I$. This is a counterexample to conjecture ``Catch 22" from the paper ``On Nash-solvability of finite $n$-person DG games, Catch 22" (2021) arXiv:2111.06278, according to which, at least 2 entries of $r$ are at least 2 for any NE-free game. However, Catch 22 remains still open for the games with a unique cyclic outcome, not to mention a weaker (and more important) conjecture claiming that an $n$-person finite DG game has a Nash equilibrium (in pure stationary strategies) when $r = (0^n)$, that is, all $n$ entries of $r$ are 0; in other words, when the following condition holds: $\qquad\bullet$ ($C_0$) any terminal outcome is better than every cyclic one for each player. A game is play-once if each player controls a unique position. It is known that any play-once game satisfying ($C_0$) has a Nash equilibrium. We give a new and very short proof of this statement. Yet, not only conjunction but already disjunction of the above two conditions may be sufficient for Nash-solvability. This is still open.
نوع الوثيقة: Working Paper
URL الوصول: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.14587
رقم الأكسشن: edsarx.2406.14587
قاعدة البيانات: arXiv