تقرير
Comparative Analysis of Jet and Underlying Event Properties Across Various Models as a Function of Charged Particle Multiplicity at 7 TeV
| العنوان: | Comparative Analysis of Jet and Underlying Event Properties Across Various Models as a Function of Charged Particle Multiplicity at 7 TeV |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Waqar, Maryam, Alrebdi, Haifa I., Waqas, Muhammad, Al-mugren, K. S., Ajaz, Muhammad |
| المصدر: | Chin. Phys. C (2024) |
| سنة النشر: | 2024 |
| المجموعة: | High Energy Physics - Experiment High Energy Physics - Phenomenology |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | High Energy Physics - Phenomenology, High Energy Physics - Experiment |
| الوصف: | In this study, a comprehensive analysis of jets and underlying events as a function of charged particle multiplicity in proton-proton (pp) collisions at a center-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV is presented. Various Monte Carlo (MC) event generators, including Pythia8.308, EPOS1.99, EPOSLHC, EPOS4$_{Hydro}$, and EPOS4$_{noHydro}$, are employed to predict particle production. The predictions from these models are compared with experimental data from the CMS collaboration. The charged particles are categorized into those associated with underlying events and those linked to jets. The analysis is restricted to charged particles with $|\eta| < 2.4$ and $p_{T} > 0.25$ GeV/c. Upon comparing the MC predictions with CMS data, it is observed that EPOS$4_{Hydro}$, EPOSLHC, and Pythia8 consistently reproduce the experimental results for all charged particles, underlying events, intrajet, and leading charged particles. For charged jet rates with $p_{T}^{ch.jet} > 5$ GeV/c, EPOS4$_{Hydro}$ and Pythia8 perform exceptionally well. In the case of charged jet rates with $p_{T}^{ch.jet} > 30$ GeV/c, EPOSLHC reproduces satisfactorily good results, while EPOS4$_{Hydro}$ exhibits good agreement with the data at higher charged particle multiplicities as compared to the other models. This can be attributed to the conversion of energy into flow when "Hydro=on," leading to an increase in multiplicity. EPOSLHC model described the data well due to the new collective flow effects, correlated flow treatment, and parametrization as compared to the EPOS1.99. However, the examination of the jet $p_{T}$ spectrum and normalized charged $p_{T}$ density reveals that EPOS4$_{Hydro}$, EPOS4$_{noHydro}$, and EPOSLHC exhibit good agreement with the experimental results, while Pythia8 and EPOS1.99 do not perform as well due to the lack of correlated flow treatment. Comment: 10 pages, 4 figures |
| نوع الوثيقة: | Working Paper |
| DOI: | 10.1088/1674-1137/ad5ae9 |
| URL الوصول: | http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.17384 |
| رقم الأكسشن: | edsarx.2406.17384 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | arXiv |
| DOI: | 10.1088/1674-1137/ad5ae9 |
|---|