دورية أكاديمية
Comparing a Mobile Phone Automated System With a Paper and Email Data Collection System: Substudy Within a Randomized Controlled Trial
| العنوان: | Comparing a Mobile Phone Automated System With a Paper and Email Data Collection System: Substudy Within a Randomized Controlled Trial |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Bond, Diana M, Hammond, Jeremy, Shand, Antonia W, Nassar, Natasha |
| المصدر: | JMIR mHealth and uHealth, Vol 8, Iss 8, p e15284 (2020) |
| بيانات النشر: | JMIR Publications, 2020. |
| سنة النشر: | 2020 |
| المجموعة: | LCC:Information technology LCC:Public aspects of medicine |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | Information technology, T58.5-58.64, Public aspects of medicine, RA1-1270 |
| الوصف: | BackgroundTraditional data collection methods using paper and email are increasingly being replaced by data collection using mobile phones, although there is limited evidence evaluating the impact of mobile phone technology as part of an automated research management system on data collection and health outcomes. ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to compare a web-based mobile phone automated system (MPAS) with a more traditional delivery and data collection system combining paper and email data collection (PEDC) in a cohort of breastfeeding women. MethodsWe conducted a substudy of a randomized controlled trial in Sydney, Australia, which included women with uncomplicated term births who intended to breastfeed. Women were recruited within 72 hours of giving birth. A quasi-randomized number of women were recruited using the PEDC system, and the remainder were recruited using the MPAS. The outcomes assessed included the effectiveness of data collection, impact on study outcomes, response rate, acceptability, and cost analysis between the MPAS and PEDC methods. ResultsWomen were recruited between April 2015 and December 2016. The analysis included 555 women: 471 using the MPAS and 84 using the PEDC. There were no differences in clinical outcomes between the 2 groups. At the end of the 8-week treatment phase, the MPAS group showed an increased response rate compared with the PEDC group (56% vs 37%; P |
| نوع الوثيقة: | article |
| وصف الملف: | electronic resource |
| اللغة: | English |
| تدمد: | 2291-5222 |
| Relation: | http://mhealth.jmir.org/2020/8/e15284/; https://doaj.org/toc/2291-5222 |
| DOI: | 10.2196/15284 |
| URL الوصول: | https://doaj.org/article/00252e85d39c40c383dff843572a4c6d |
| رقم الأكسشن: | edsdoj.00252e85d39c40c383dff843572a4c6d |
| قاعدة البيانات: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
Full Text Finder | تدمد: | 22915222 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.2196/15284 |