دورية أكاديمية

Alternate Pembrolizumab Dosing Interval in Advanced NSCLC with PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50%: 3 Weekly Compared to 6 Weekly Dosing

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Alternate Pembrolizumab Dosing Interval in Advanced NSCLC with PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50%: 3 Weekly Compared to 6 Weekly Dosing
المؤلفون: Lauren Jones, Rebekah Rittberg, Bonnie Leung, Aria Shokoohi, Alexandra Pender, Selina Wong, Zamzam Al-Hashami, Ying Wang, Cheryl Ho
المصدر: Current Oncology, Vol 29, Iss 11, Pp 8686-8692 (2022)
بيانات النشر: MDPI AG, 2022.
سنة النشر: 2022
المجموعة: LCC:Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens
مصطلحات موضوعية: PDL1, pembrolizumab, dosing schedule, NSCLC, Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens, RC254-282
الوصف: Background: A fixed dose of 200 mg of pembrolizumab every 3 weeks (Q3W) is the standard of care for patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and PDL1 ≥50%. In April 2020, based on pharmacokinetic modeling without formal comparative studies, the FDA approved 400 mg every 6 weeks (Q6W). Pharmacokinetic studies also suggested comparable target engagement with weight-based and flat dosing for the respective schedules. The objective of this study was to determine if overall survival (OS) differs based on the Q3W vs. Q6W dosing schedule of pembrolizumab. Methods: BC Cancer patients with stage IV NSCLC and PDL1 ≥50% treated with pembrolizumab were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were treated with weight-based dosing, per institution standard, of pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg Q3W or 4 mg/kg Q6W. Patient demographics, treatment and outcome were recorded. Patients were assigned to Q3W or Q6W according to the schedule that was used for the majority of treatment (greater than 50%). Results: 718 patients with NSCLC and PDL1 ≥50% received first-line pembrolizumab between 2017 and2021, Q3W/Q6W dosing 677/41 patients. Baseline characteristics with respect to age, sex, smoking status, histology and performance status (PS) were similar between groups. In the multivariate model, including age, sex, PS and dosing schedule, the hazard ratio for death (HR) for OS Q3W vs. Q6W was 0.759 (p = 0.230). A 2:1 case-matched analysis for OS was performed, controlling for sex, age ± 5 years, PS and duration on pembrolizumab ± 2 months for Q3W vs. Q6W (n = 113) with a HR 0.834 (p = 0.500). Conclusions: There was no OS difference demonstrated with pembrolizumab dosing Q3W compared to Q6W in a multivariate analysis that included age, sex and PS. A case-matched analysis that controlled for these variables and for duration of treatment confirmed these findings. This study supports the use of Q6W pembrolizumab dosing, allowing for less frequent interactions with the medical system.
نوع الوثيقة: article
وصف الملف: electronic resource
اللغة: English
تدمد: 1718-7729
1198-0052
Relation: https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/29/11/685; https://doaj.org/toc/1198-0052; https://doaj.org/toc/1718-7729
DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29110685
URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/e00a766de58841df86bd311c86c0dc6b
رقم الأكسشن: edsdoj.00a766de58841df86bd311c86c0dc6b
قاعدة البيانات: Directory of Open Access Journals
الوصف
تدمد:17187729
11980052
DOI:10.3390/curroncol29110685