دورية أكاديمية
Assessing the impact of university students’ involvement in the first year of Nurture-U: a national student wellbeing research project
| العنوان: | Assessing the impact of university students’ involvement in the first year of Nurture-U: a national student wellbeing research project |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Jemima Dooley, Amina Ghezal, Thomas Gilpin, Husna Hassan Basri, Katy Humberstone, Amber Lahdelma, Pranati Misurya, Ellen Marshall, Ed Watkins |
| المصدر: | Research Involvement and Engagement, Vol 9, Iss 1, Pp 1-15 (2023) |
| بيانات النشر: | BMC, 2023. |
| سنة النشر: | 2023 |
| المجموعة: | LCC:Medicine LCC:Medicine (General) |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | Mental health, Co-design, Public involvement, Students, Co-production, Public engagement, Medicine, Medicine (General), R5-920 |
| الوصف: | Abstract Background Students experience lower levels of wellbeing than the general, age-matched population. A whole-university approach to mental health is encouraged, which must work for individuals from all backgrounds and experiences. Student input is vital in researching and designing these solutions. Nurture-U is a national, large-scale research project exploring better ways to support student wellbeing, with a Student Advisory Group (SAG) that feeds into project decision making. With the first year of the project now completed, we now critically review the processes and effectiveness of the SAG and how well the project is engaging and working with students. Methods Assessment of the SAG’s impact on the project, the student advisors, and the researchers was undertaken through a content analysis of team meetings and collection of advisor and researcher feedback using the Patient Engagement Quality Guidance Tool. Results 142 students worked on different tasks in the first year of the Nurture-U project. The SAG was involved in the project branding and marketing, and in the development and co-design of interventions and tools. They reported a positive experience, with involvement boosting confidence. They felt valued but reported not always knowing whether their input was implemented in final decisions. They also recommended different methods of providing feedback. Researchers found student input beneficial to communicate the viewpoint of a different generation and increase the relevance of the study, but also suggested improvements for communication between the research team and the student group. Conclusions This critical reflection of the SAG’s public advisor role in this large-scale research project was important in highlighting what worked well and areas to improve. As the project unfolds, we aim to adapt our methods of student input, increase the transparency of decision-making processes, and in turn increase student-led decision making within the project. |
| نوع الوثيقة: | article |
| وصف الملف: | electronic resource |
| اللغة: | English |
| تدمد: | 2056-7529 |
| Relation: | https://doaj.org/toc/2056-7529 |
| DOI: | 10.1186/s40900-023-00478-7 |
| URL الوصول: | https://doaj.org/article/094954b96c234301813ee5b33a62bd91 |
| رقم الأكسشن: | edsdoj.094954b96c234301813ee5b33a62bd91 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
Find this article in full text from Springer Verlag. 
Full Text Finder | تدمد: | 20567529 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.1186/s40900-023-00478-7 |