دورية أكاديمية
Assessment of current methane emission quantification techniques for natural gas midstream applications
| العنوان: | Assessment of current methane emission quantification techniques for natural gas midstream applications |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Y. Liu, J.-D. Paris, G. Broquet, V. Bescós Roy, T. Meixus Fernandez, R. Andersen, A. Russu Berlanga, E. Christensen, Y. Courtois, S. Dominok, C. Dussenne, T. Eckert, A. Finlayson, A. Fernández de la Fuente, C. Gunn, R. Hashmonay, J. Grigoleto Hayashi, J. Helmore, S. Honsel, F. Innocenti, M. Irjala, T. Log, C. Lopez, F. Cortés Martínez, J. Martinez, A. Massardier, H. G. Nygaard, P. Agregan Reboredo, E. Rousset, A. Scherello, M. Ulbricht, D. Weidmann, O. Williams, N. Yarrow, M. Zarea, R. Ziegler, J. Sciare, M. Vrekoussis, P. Bousquet |
| المصدر: | Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, Vol 17, Pp 1633-1649 (2024) |
| بيانات النشر: | Copernicus Publications, 2024. |
| سنة النشر: | 2024 |
| المجموعة: | LCC:Environmental engineering LCC:Earthwork. Foundations |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | Environmental engineering, TA170-171, Earthwork. Foundations, TA715-787 |
| الوصف: | Methane emissions from natural gas systems are increasingly scrutinized, and accurate reporting requires quantification of site- and source-level measurement. We evaluate the performance of 10 available state-of-the-art CH4 emission quantification approaches against a blind controlled-release experiment at an inerted natural gas compressor station in 2021. The experiment consisted of 17 blind 2 h releases at a single exhaust point or multiple simultaneous ones. The controlled releases covered a range of methane flow rates from 0.01 to 50 kg h−1. Measurement platforms included aircraft, drones, trucks, vans, ground-based stations, and handheld systems. Herewith, we compare their respective strengths, weaknesses, and potential complementarity depending on the emission rates and atmospheric conditions. Most systems were able to quantify the releases within an order of magnitude. The level of errors from the different systems was not significantly influenced by release rates larger than 0.1 kg h−1, with much poorer results for the 0.01 kg h−1 release. It was found that handheld optical gas imaging (OGI) cameras underestimated the emissions. In contrast, the “site-level” systems, relying on atmospheric dispersion, tended to overestimate the emission rates. We assess the dependence of emission quantification performance on key parameters such as wind speed, deployment constraints, and measurement duration. At the low wind speeds encountered (below 2 m s−1), the experiments did not reveal a significant dependence on wind speed. The ability to quantify individual sources degraded during multiple-source releases. Compliance with the Oil and Gas Methane Partnership's (OGMP 2.0) highest level of reporting may require a combination of the specific advantages of each measurement technique and will depend on reconciliation approaches. Self-reported uncertainties were either not available or were based on the standard deviation in a series of independent realizations or fixed values from expert judgment or theoretical considerations. For most systems, the overall relative errors estimated in this study are higher than self-reported uncertainties. |
| نوع الوثيقة: | article |
| وصف الملف: | electronic resource |
| اللغة: | English |
| تدمد: | 1633-2024 1867-1381 1867-8548 |
| Relation: | https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/17/1633/2024/amt-17-1633-2024.pdf; https://doaj.org/toc/1867-1381; https://doaj.org/toc/1867-8548 |
| DOI: | 10.5194/amt-17-1633-2024 |
| URL الوصول: | https://doaj.org/article/0a5227365b6d405090eb164d8573b23c |
| رقم الأكسشن: | edsdoj.0a5227365b6d405090eb164d8573b23c |
| قاعدة البيانات: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
Full Text Finder | تدمد: | 16332024 18671381 18678548 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.5194/amt-17-1633-2024 |