دورية أكاديمية

Inferring models of opinion dynamics from aggregated jury data.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Inferring models of opinion dynamics from aggregated jury data.
المؤلفون: Keith Burghardt, William Rand, Michelle Girvan
المصدر: PLoS ONE, Vol 14, Iss 7, p e0218312 (2019)
بيانات النشر: Public Library of Science (PLoS), 2019.
سنة النشر: 2019
المجموعة: LCC:Medicine
LCC:Science
مصطلحات موضوعية: Medicine, Science
الوصف: Jury deliberations provide a quintessential example of collective decision-making, but few studies have probed the available data to explore how juries reach verdicts. We examine how features of jury dynamics can be better understood from the joint distribution of final votes and deliberation time. To do this, we fit several different decision-making models to jury datasets from different places and times. In our best-fit model, jurors influence each other and have an increasing tendency to stick to their opinion of the defendant's guilt or innocence. We also show that this model can explain spikes in mean deliberation times when juries are hung, sub-linear scaling between mean deliberation times and trial duration, and unexpected final vote and deliberation time distributions. Our findings suggest that both stubbornness and herding play an important role in collective decision-making, providing a nuanced insight into how juries reach verdicts, and more generally, how group decisions emerge.
نوع الوثيقة: article
وصف الملف: electronic resource
اللغة: English
تدمد: 1932-6203
Relation: https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218312
URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/a1020d71972443a194de433606ea3595
رقم الأكسشن: edsdoj.1020d71972443a194de433606ea3595
قاعدة البيانات: Directory of Open Access Journals
الوصف
تدمد:19326203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0218312