دورية أكاديمية
Towards a new definition of return-to-work outcomes in common mental disorders from a multi-stakeholder perspective.
| العنوان: | Towards a new definition of return-to-work outcomes in common mental disorders from a multi-stakeholder perspective. |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Hiske L Hees, Karen Nieuwenhuijsen, Maarten W J Koeter, Ute Bültmann, Aart H Schene |
| المصدر: | PLoS ONE, Vol 7, Iss 6, p e39947 (2012) |
| بيانات النشر: | Public Library of Science (PLoS), 2012. |
| سنة النشر: | 2012 |
| المجموعة: | LCC:Medicine LCC:Science |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | Medicine, Science |
| الوصف: | OBJECTIVES: To examine the perspectives of key stakeholders involved in the return-to-work (RTW) process regarding the definition of successful RTW outcome after sickness absence related to common mental disorders (CMD's). METHODS: A mixed-method design was used: First, we used qualitative methods (focus groups, interviews) to identify a broad range of criteria important for the definition of successful RTW (N = 57). Criteria were grouped into content-related clusters. Second, we used a quantitative approach (online questionnaire) to identify, among a larger stakeholder sample (N = 178), the clusters and criteria most important for successful RTW. RESULTS: A total of 11 clusters, consisting of 52 unique criteria, were identified. In defining successful RTW, supervisors and occupational physicians regarded "Sustainability" and "At-work functioning" most important, while employees regarded "Sustainability," "Job satisfaction," "Work-home balance," and "Mental Functioning" most important. Despite agreement on the importance of certain criteria, considerable differences among stakeholders were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Key stakeholders vary in the aspects and criteria they regard as important when defining successful RTW after CMD-related sickness absence. Current definitions of RTW outcomes used in scientific research may not accurately reflect these key stakeholder perspectives. Future studies should be more aware of the perspective from which they aim to evaluate the effectiveness of a RTW intervention, and define their RTW outcomes accordingly. |
| نوع الوثيقة: | article |
| وصف الملف: | electronic resource |
| اللغة: | English |
| تدمد: | 1932-6203 |
| Relation: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3386986?pdf=render; https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203 |
| DOI: | 10.1371/journal.pone.0039947 |
| URL الوصول: | https://doaj.org/article/1c94bd335f5e49b2bc4f04119bf17b74 |
| رقم الأكسشن: | edsdoj.1c94bd335f5e49b2bc4f04119bf17b74 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
Full Text Finder | تدمد: | 19326203 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.1371/journal.pone.0039947 |