دورية أكاديمية

Risk Factors and Interpretation of Inconclusive Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology in the Diagnosis of Solid Pancreatic Lesions

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Risk Factors and Interpretation of Inconclusive Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology in the Diagnosis of Solid Pancreatic Lesions
المؤلفون: Renáta Bor, Béla Vasas, Anna Fábián, Mónika Szűcs, Zsófia Bősze, Anita Bálint, Mariann Rutka, Klaudia Farkas, Tibor Tóth, Tamás Resál, Péter Bacsur, Tamás Molnár, Zoltán Szepes
المصدر: Diagnostics, Vol 13, Iss 17, p 2841 (2023)
بيانات النشر: MDPI AG, 2023.
سنة النشر: 2023
المجموعة: LCC:Medicine (General)
مصطلحات موضوعية: EUS-FNA, pancreatic cancer, risk of malignancy, inconclusive cytology, Medicine (General), R5-920
الوصف: Background: The inconclusive cytological findings of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) remain a major clinical challenge and often lead to treatment delays. Methods: Patients who had undergone EUS-FNA sampling for solid pancreas lesions between 2014 and 2021 were retrospectively enrolled. The “atypical” and “non-diagnostic” categories of the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology System were considered inconclusive and the “negative for malignancy” category of malignancy was suspected clinically. We determined the frequency and predictors of inconclusive cytological finding. Results: A total of 473 first EUS-FNA samples were included, of which 108 cases (22.83%) were inconclusive. Significant increases in the odds of inconclusive cytological findings were observed for lesions with a benign final diagnosis (OR 11.20; 95% CI 6.56–19.54, p < 0.001) as well as with the use of 25 G FNA needles (OR 2.12; 95% CI 1.09–4.01, p = 0.023) compared to 22 G needles. Furthermore, the use of a single EUS-FNA technique compared to the combined use of slow-pull and standard suction techniques (OR 1.70; 95% CI 1.06–2.70, p = 0.027) and less than three punctures per procedure led to an elevation in the risk of inconclusive cytology (OR 2.49; 95% CI 1.49–4.14, p < 0.001). Risk reduction in inconclusive cytology findings was observed in lesions between 2–4 cm (OR 0.40; 95% CI 0.23–0.68, p = 0.001) and >4 cm (OR 0.16; 95% CI 0.08–0.31, p < 0.001) compared to lesions ≤2 cm. Conclusions: The more than two punctures per EUS-FNA sampling with larger-diameter needle (19 G or 22 G) using the slow-pull and standard suction techniques in combination may decrease the probability of inconclusive cytological findings.
نوع الوثيقة: article
وصف الملف: electronic resource
اللغة: English
تدمد: 2075-4418
Relation: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/13/17/2841; https://doaj.org/toc/2075-4418
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13172841
URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/c208f518ec794315a2425b7aa5a461ea
رقم الأكسشن: edsdoj.208f518ec794315a2425b7aa5a461ea
قاعدة البيانات: Directory of Open Access Journals
الوصف
تدمد:20754418
DOI:10.3390/diagnostics13172841