دورية أكاديمية

Evaluation of rescue medication use and medication adherence receiving umeclidinium/vilanterol versus tiotropium bromide/olodaterol

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Evaluation of rescue medication use and medication adherence receiving umeclidinium/vilanterol versus tiotropium bromide/olodaterol
المؤلفون: Moretz C, Bengtson LGS, Sharpsten L, Koep E, Le L, Tong J, Stanford RH, Hahn B, Ray R
المصدر: International Journal of COPD, Vol Volume 14, Pp 2047-2060 (2019)
بيانات النشر: Dove Medical Press, 2019.
سنة النشر: 2019
المجموعة: LCC:Diseases of the respiratory system
مصطلحات موضوعية: COPD, long-acting β2-agonists, long-acting muscarinic antagonists, adherence, rescue medication, real world, Diseases of the respiratory system, RC705-779
الوصف: Chad Moretz1, Lindsay GS Bengtson2, Lucie Sharpsten2, Eleena Koep2, Lisa Le2, Junliang Tong2, Richard H Stanford1, Beth Hahn1, Riju Ray1 1Glaxo Smith Kline, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC, USA; 2Optum, Eden Prairie, MN, USACorrespondence: Chad MoretzGlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, 5 Moore Drive, Durham, NC, USATel +1 828 442 6294Email chad.x.moretz@gsk.comBackground: This was the first real-world head-to-head study comparing inhaled long-acting muscarinic antagonist/long-acting β2-agonist fixed-dose combination treatments as maintenance therapy.Methods: Retrospective observational study including commercial, Medicare Advantage with Part D or Part D-only enrollees aged ≥40 years from the Optum Research Database. Patients initiated umeclidinium/vilanterol (UMEC/VI) or tiotropium bromide/olodaterol (TIO/OLO) between June 1, 2015 and November 30, 2016 (index date) with 12 months of pre- and post-index continuous enrollment. Outcomes were modeled following the inverse probability of treatment weighting. The primary endpoint, rescue medication use, was modeled using weighted ordinary least squares regression with bootstrapped variance estimation. Intent-to-treat analysis evaluated non-inferiority and superiority of UMEC/VI to TIO/OLO with thresholds of 0.30 and 0 units, respectively. On-treatment sensitivity analysis evaluated the superiority of UMEC/VI to TIO/OLO for rescue medication use. The secondary endpoint, medication adherence (proportion of days covered [PDC]≥80%), was evaluated using weighted logistic regression. Post hoc weighted Cox proportional hazards regression analysis evaluated escalation to multiple inhaler triple therapy (MITT).Results: The study population included 14,324 patients; 9549 initiated UMEC/VI and 4775 initiated TIO/OLO. During the 12-month post-index period, UMEC/VI initiators used 0.16 fewer adjusted mean units of rescue medication than TIO/OLO initiators (95% CI: −0.28, −0.04), meeting pre-specified non-inferiority (P
نوع الوثيقة: article
وصف الملف: electronic resource
اللغة: English
تدمد: 1178-2005
Relation: https://www.dovepress.com/evaluation-of-rescue-medication-use-and-medication-adherence-receiving-peer-reviewed-article-COPD; https://doaj.org/toc/1178-2005
URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/22c75b6b9439405e82cfc0f4e4adda79
رقم الأكسشن: edsdoj.22c75b6b9439405e82cfc0f4e4adda79
قاعدة البيانات: Directory of Open Access Journals