Retrospective analysis of nystagmus characteristics and clinical applications of positional testing in patients with cupulolithiasis of the posterior semicircular canal in benign paroxysmal positional vertigo
التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان:
Retrospective analysis of nystagmus characteristics and clinical applications of positional testing in patients with cupulolithiasis of the posterior semicircular canal in benign paroxysmal positional vertigo
ObjectiveThis study aimed to investigate the characteristics of positional nystagmus in patients with cupulolithiasis of the posterior semicircular canal-benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (PC-BPPV-cu) to improve clinical diagnostic accuracy.MethodsThis study retrospectively analyzed 128 cases of PC-BPPV-cu and 128 cases of canalolithiasis of BPPV (PC-BPPV-ca). General data, intensity, distribution, and the correlation of positional nystagmus were compared between the two groups.ResultsCompared to the PC-BPPV-ca group, more cases from the PC-BPPV-cu group initially presented in the emergency department (P < 0.05). The most frequent positional nystagmus induced by PC-BPPV-cu was torsional-upbeat nystagmus, characterized by the upper pole of the affected eye beating toward the lower ear and vertically upward (387 cases, 59.7%). It was followed by torsional-downbeat nystagmus, characterized by the upper pole of the unaffected eye beating toward the lower ear and vertically downward (164 cases, 25.3%). The former represented posterior canal excitatory nystagmus (PC-EN), while the latter represented posterior canal inhibitory nystagmus (PC-IN). In the PC-BPPV-cu group, PC-EN was most easily caused by the Half Dix–Hallpike (HH) maneuver on the affected side, while PC-IN was most easily induced by a face-down position (FDP) on the unaffected side at approximately 45° angle (45° FDP). The vertical slow phase velocity (v-SPV) of positional nystagmus was more potent in the affected HH than in other positions with PC-EN (all P < 0.05); the v-SPV of positional nystagmus was greater in the 45° FDP than in different positions with PC-IN (all P < 0.05); the v-SPV of the affected Dix–Hallpike (DH) maneuver in the PC-BPPV-ca group was significantly greater than that of the affected HH maneuver in the PC-BPPV-cu group (P < 0.05). The a priori analysis showed that the strongest correlation with HH positional nystagmus was observed in the affected side roll test, followed by the DH maneuver.ConclusionIn the PC-BPPV-cu group, the HH maneuver most easily induced PC-EN on the affected side, and PC-IN was most easily induced by the 45° FDP. In some cases of PC-BPPV-cu, significant nystagmus was not observed to be induced in the DH position on the affected side; however, vertical rotation nystagmus was induced in the roll-test position on the affected side. In such cases, PC-BPPV-cu diagnosis should be considered, and HH and 45° FDP tests should be conducted to support the diagnosis.
Full Text Finder