دورية أكاديمية
Evaluating and understanding combination therapy decision drivers for the treatment of overactive bladder in the United States
العنوان: | Evaluating and understanding combination therapy decision drivers for the treatment of overactive bladder in the United States |
---|---|
المؤلفون: | Stephen R. Kraus, Junlong Li, Rita M. Kristy, Amy Lockefeer, Hongbo Yang, Mo Zhou, David R. Walker |
المصدر: | Journal of International Medical Research, Vol 50 (2022) |
بيانات النشر: | SAGE Publishing, 2022. |
سنة النشر: | 2022 |
المجموعة: | LCC:Medicine (General) |
مصطلحات موضوعية: | Medicine (General), R5-920 |
الوصف: | Objective To understand factors guiding overactive bladder (OAB) therapy selection and experience with combination therapy (antimuscarinics and beta-3 agonists). Methods Cross-sectional surveys of OAB patients and OAB-treating physicians in the USA were conducted. Patients receiving monotherapy with antimuscarinics were categorized by OAB treatment history: monotherapy only; third-line procedures (e.g., onabotulinumtoxinA injections) and combination therapy; third-line therapy only; and combination therapy only. The patient survey assessed therapy choice drivers and barriers, treatment satisfaction and sociodemographic/clinical characteristics. The physician survey assessed drivers of and barriers to OAB treatment choices. Results Of 200 patients, 86.5% reported involvement in treatment decision-making; doctor’s recommendation was the most frequently considered factor (84.4%). Most patients (71%) were unaware of combination therapy. The primary reason why those patients aware of combination therapy had not used it (N = 43/200; 21%) was physician recommendation of other treatments (69.8%). For physicians (N = 50), the most frequently considered factors when prescribing OAB treatment were effectiveness (92.0%) and side effects (84.0%); 70% prescribed combination therapy, primarily for symptom severity (82.9%). The main reasons for not prescribing combination therapy were cost/insurance coverage (80%) and lack of information (53.3%). Conclusions Shared decision-making guided treatment decisions; the main considerations were treatment safety and efficacy. |
نوع الوثيقة: | article |
وصف الملف: | electronic resource |
اللغة: | English |
تدمد: | 1473-2300 03000605 |
Relation: | https://doaj.org/toc/1473-2300 |
DOI: | 10.1177/03000605221098176 |
URL الوصول: | https://doaj.org/article/d2c73b2452f94bd4a35dcec0acbbae66 |
رقم الأكسشن: | edsdoj.2c73b2452f94bd4a35dcec0acbbae66 |
قاعدة البيانات: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
تدمد: | 14732300 03000605 |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.1177/03000605221098176 |