دورية أكاديمية
Follow-up focused on psychological intervention initiated after intensive care unit in adult patients and informal caregivers: a systematic review and meta-analysis
العنوان: | Follow-up focused on psychological intervention initiated after intensive care unit in adult patients and informal caregivers: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
---|---|
المؤلفون: | Shodai Yoshihiro, Shunsuke Taito, Kota Yamauchi, Shunsuke Kina, Takero Terayama, Yusuke Tsutsumi, Yuki Kataoka, Takeshi Unoki |
المصدر: | PeerJ, Vol 11, p e15260 (2023) |
بيانات النشر: | PeerJ Inc., 2023. |
سنة النشر: | 2023 |
المجموعة: | LCC:Medicine LCC:Biology (General) |
مصطلحات موضوعية: | Intensive care units, Critical care, Mental disorders, Post intensive care syndrome, Medicine, Biology (General), QH301-705.5 |
الوصف: | Psychological dysfunction is one of the considerable health-related outcomes among critically-ill patients and their informal caregivers. Follow-up of intensive care unit (ICU) survivors has been conducted in a variety of different ways, with different timing after discharge, targets of interest (physical, psychological, social) and measures used. Of diverse ICU follow-up, the effects of follow-ups which focused on psychological interventions are unknown. Our research question was whether follow-up with patients and their informal caregivers after ICU discharge improved mental health compared to usual care. We published a protocol for this systematic review and meta-analysis in https://www.protocols.io/ (https://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.bvjwn4pe). We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycInfo from their inception to May 2022. We included randomized controlled trials for follow-ups after ICU discharge and focused on psychological intervention for critically ill adult patients and their informal caregivers. We synthesized primary outcomes, including depression, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and adverse events using the random-effects method. We used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach to rate the certainty of evidence. From the 10,471 records, we identified 13 studies (n = 3, 366) focusing on patients and four (n = 538) focusing on informal caregivers. ICU follow-up for patients resulted in little to no difference in the prevalence of depression (RR 0.89, 95% CI [0.59–1.34]; low-certainty evidence) and PTSD (RR 0.84, 95% CI [0.55–1.30]; low-certainty evidence) among patients; however, it increased the prevalence of depression (RR 1.58 95% CI [1.01–2.46]; very low-certainty evidence), PTSD (RR 1.36, 95% CI [0.91–2.03]; very low-certainty evidence) among informal caregivers. The evidence for the effect of ICU follow-up on adverse events among patients was insufficient. Eligible studies for informal caregivers did not define any adverse event. The effect of follow-ups after ICU discharge that focused on psychological intervention should be uncertain. |
نوع الوثيقة: | article |
وصف الملف: | electronic resource |
اللغة: | English |
تدمد: | 2167-8359 |
Relation: | https://peerj.com/articles/15260.pdf; https://peerj.com/articles/15260/; https://doaj.org/toc/2167-8359 |
DOI: | 10.7717/peerj.15260 |
URL الوصول: | https://doaj.org/article/e2e9a94919ad4943bc34da88771b043c |
رقم الأكسشن: | edsdoj.2e9a94919ad4943bc34da88771b043c |
قاعدة البيانات: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
تدمد: | 21678359 |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.7717/peerj.15260 |