دورية أكاديمية
Activities and impacts of patient engagement in CIHR SPOR funded research: a cross-sectional survey of academic researcher and patient partner experiences
| العنوان: | Activities and impacts of patient engagement in CIHR SPOR funded research: a cross-sectional survey of academic researcher and patient partner experiences |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Anna Maria Chudyk, Roger Stoddard, Nicola McCleary, Todd A. Duhamel, Carolyn Shimmin, Serena Hickes, Annette S. H. Schultz |
| المصدر: | Research Involvement and Engagement, Vol 8, Iss 1, Pp 1-14 (2022) |
| بيانات النشر: | BMC, 2022. |
| سنة النشر: | 2022 |
| المجموعة: | LCC:Medicine LCC:Medicine (General) |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | Patient and public involvement, Patient involvement, Stakeholder engagement, Patient engagement in research, Patient-oriented research, Medicine, Medicine (General), R5-920 |
| الوصف: | Plain English Summary The Canadian Institutes of Health Research developed the Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research (SPOR) to help increase capacity for patient engagement in research. However, little is known about the ways in which Canadian patient co-researchers (i.e., patient partners) are being engaged in research and the perceived impacts of engagement. Therefore, this study aimed to describe engagement activities and perceived impacts of SPOR-funded projects. To do so, we carried out an online survey of academic researchers and patient partners engaging in projects funded through 13 SPOR funding calls. We analysed the collected data using thematic analysis, which focuses on finding themes among data. Sixty-six of 511 academic researchers and 20 of 28 patient partners contacted completed the survey and were included in analyses. We found that patient partners were engaged in seven types of activities across the research cycle: (a) sharing experiences/giving advice, (b) identifying the research focus/methods, (c) developing/revising aspects of the project, (d) conducting research activities, (e) study participation, (f) presenting on behalf of the project, and (g) other grant development or knowledge translation activities. We also found that engagement was associated with six different types of impacts related to knowledge, outputs, or directions being (a) created, (b) moulded, (c) confirmed, or (d) chosen/prioritized, (e) perceived success of the research, and (f) minimal/negative impacts on the research. The findings of this study can be used to inform ongoing and future research, including empowering patient partners to be more informed and actively shape how they may contribute to research processes. |
| نوع الوثيقة: | article |
| وصف الملف: | electronic resource |
| اللغة: | English |
| تدمد: | 2056-7529 |
| Relation: | https://doaj.org/toc/2056-7529 |
| DOI: | 10.1186/s40900-022-00376-4 |
| URL الوصول: | https://doaj.org/article/3b90cdea15fc4e709eb4e714d224e2ac |
| رقم الأكسشن: | edsdoj.3b90cdea15fc4e709eb4e714d224e2ac |
| قاعدة البيانات: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
Find this article in full text from Springer Verlag. 
Full Text Finder | تدمد: | 20567529 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.1186/s40900-022-00376-4 |