دورية أكاديمية
CILFIT in Strasbourg
| العنوان: | CILFIT in Strasbourg |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Jasper Krommendijk |
| المصدر: | Verfassungsblog, Iss 2366-7044 (2024) |
| بيانات النشر: | Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbH, 2024. |
| سنة النشر: | 2024 |
| المجموعة: | LCC:Law |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | ECHR, ECtHR, Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte, Straßburg, admissibility, Law |
| الوصف: | On 19 February 2024, the European Court of Human Rights decided not to answer the Estonian Supreme Court’s request for an advisory opinion on the basis of Protocol 16 (P16). For the first time, it dismissed a request because it did not concern a question of principle concerning the interpretation and application of ECHR rights. The decision is significant because the ECtHR provides clear contours as to what types of questions courts should (not) ask. |
| نوع الوثيقة: | article |
| وصف الملف: | electronic resource |
| اللغة: | German English |
| تدمد: | 2366-7044 |
| Relation: | https://verfassungsblog.de/cilfit-in-strasbourg/; https://doaj.org/toc/2366-7044 |
| DOI: | 10.59704/6bef0271e6de70c8 |
| URL الوصول: | https://doaj.org/article/3e73066ccaa54294a927997763e7f82f |
| رقم الأكسشن: | edsdoj.3e73066ccaa54294a927997763e7f82f |
| قاعدة البيانات: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
Full Text Finder | تدمد: | 23667044 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.59704/6bef0271e6de70c8 |