دورية أكاديمية

Evaluation of post-ERCP pancreatitis after biliary stenting with self-expandable metal stents vs. plastic stents in benign and malignant obstructions

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Evaluation of post-ERCP pancreatitis after biliary stenting with self-expandable metal stents vs. plastic stents in benign and malignant obstructions
المؤلفون: Nichol S. Martinez, Sumant Inamdar, Sheila N. Firoozan, Stephanie Izard, Calvin Lee, Petros C. Benias, Arvind J. Trindade, Divyesh V. Sejpal
المصدر: Endoscopy International Open, Vol 09, Iss 06, Pp E888-E894 (2021)
بيانات النشر: Georg Thieme Verlag KG, 2021.
سنة النشر: 2021
المجموعة: LCC:Diseases of the digestive system. Gastroenterology
مصطلحات موضوعية: Diseases of the digestive system. Gastroenterology, RC799-869
الوصف: Background and study aims There are conflicting data regarding the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) with self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS) compared to polyethylene stents (PS) in malignant biliary obstructions and limited data related to benign obstructions. Patients and methods A retrospective cohort study was performed of 1136 patients who underwent ERCP for biliary obstruction and received SEMS or PS at a tertiary-care medical center between January 2011 and October 2016. We evaluated the association between stent type (SEMS vs PS) and PEP in malignant and benign biliary obstructions. Results Among the 1136 patients included in our study, 399 had SEMS placed and 737 had PS placed. Patients with PS were more likely to have pancreatic duct cannulation, pancreatic duct stent placement, double guidewire technique, sphincterotomy and sphincteroplasty as compared to the SEMS group. On multivariate analysis, PEP rates were higher in the SEMS group (8.0 %) versus the PS group (4.8 %) (OR 2.27 [CI, 1.22, 4.24]) for all obstructions. For malignant obstructions, PEP rates were 7.8 % and 6.6 % for SEMS and plastic stents, respectively (OR 1.54 [CI, 0.72, 3.30]). For benign obstructions the PEP rate was higher in the SEMS group (8.8 %) compared to the PS group (4.2 %) (OR 3.67 [CI, 1.50, 8.97]). No significant differences between PEP severity were identified based on stent type when stratified based on benign and malignant. Conclusions PEP rates were higher when SEMS were used for benign obstruction as compared to PS. For malignant obstruction, no difference was identified in PEP rates with use of SEMS vs PS.
نوع الوثيقة: article
وصف الملف: electronic resource
اللغة: English
تدمد: 2364-3722
2196-9736
Relation: https://doaj.org/toc/2364-3722; https://doaj.org/toc/2196-9736
DOI: 10.1055/a-1388-6964
URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/ce4165d13013415fb1dd4ae25cc56123
رقم الأكسشن: edsdoj.4165d13013415fb1dd4ae25cc56123
قاعدة البيانات: Directory of Open Access Journals
الوصف
تدمد:23643722
21969736
DOI:10.1055/a-1388-6964