Objective: Case reports, tissue pathology, and autopsies have suggested that the hydrophilic polymer coating designed to improve endovascular deliverability and minimize vessel trauma can embolize and be associated with adverse outcomes such as ischemia, infarction, and death. This study sought to determine whether hydrophilic polymers shed off commercially available sheaths in a controlled in vitro environment, with the hypothesis that significant differences between coated and uncoated (control) sheaths would be found. Methods: Six sheaths from each manufacturer, including Zenith Alpha abdominal endovascular stent grafts (Cook Medical), DrySeal sheaths (W.L. Gore & Associates), and Sentrant Introducer sheaths (Medtronic), were tested in an in vitro environment. Noncoated Check-Flo performer introducer sheaths (Cook Medical) were used as controls. Each test circuit ran for 150 minutes at an output of 3 L/min, the circuit was then drained and the fluid collected. Quantitative analysis included weighing the dried filter paper and using particle size light scattering to quantify the particle size and count. Attenuated total reflectance spectroscopy was also used. Results: Each of the three coated sheaths had significantly greater shedding compared with the control sheaths. The Cook Zenith alpha sheath had significantly more residue weight (2.87 ± 0.52 mg/L) than the Gore DrySeal (1.07 ± 0.06 mg/L) and Medtronic Sentrant introducer (0.98 ± 0.14 mg/L) sheaths. The average particle size was not significantly different between the coated and uncoated (control) sheaths. Attenuated total reflectance spectroscopy identified sheath particulate in the Cook Zenith Alpha and Medtronic Sentrant samples. Conclusions: Polymer embolization was present and significantly greater in all three commercially available hydrophilic sheaths compared with the control group. Further investigation is needed into the clinical significance of these findings. : Clinical Relevance: Hydrophilic polymer coatings have significantly enhanced patient outcomes after endovascular procedures. However, isolated case reports have raised concerns about the potential embolization of such coatings, leading to end-organ ischemia and damage. Our results confirm the presence of this phenomenon. This knowledge will enable patients, physicians, and manufactures to make informed decisions and take appropriate precautions. Furthermore, it is imperative to conduct further research to thoroughly characterize the embolization profile of different sheaths. Such investigations would contribute to our understanding of the problem and provide valuable information for manufactures to guide the development of safer and more reliable devices.
Full Text via ClinicalKey 
Full Text Finder