دورية أكاديمية
Freedom to Discuss Religion Between Facts and Opinions - The Role of the ECtHR Case Law in a Current Prosecution Case in Turkey
| العنوان: | Freedom to Discuss Religion Between Facts and Opinions - The Role of the ECtHR Case Law in a Current Prosecution Case in Turkey |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Tolga Şirin |
| المصدر: | Verfassungsblog, Iss 2366-7044 (2024) |
| بيانات النشر: | Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbH, 2024. |
| سنة النشر: | 2024 |
| المجموعة: | LCC:Law |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | E.S. Case, ECtHR, Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte, Straßburg, Freedom of speeech, Religious feelings, Turkey, Law |
| الوصف: | In a recent televised discussion in Turkey, two Youtube-influencers have discussed Sharia law and Muhammad’s marriage with Aisha. This has caused strong reactions on social media. Moreover, after a public statement of the Justice Minister, a criminal investigation has been initiated. I argue that such statements should enjoy the full protection of freedom of expression. However, I criticise the distinction between “statements of fact and value judgements” as introduced by the ECtHR in case E.S. v Austria. |
| نوع الوثيقة: | article |
| وصف الملف: | electronic resource |
| اللغة: | German English |
| تدمد: | 2366-7044 |
| Relation: | https://verfassungsblog.de/religion-between-facts-and-opinions/; https://doaj.org/toc/2366-7044 |
| DOI: | 10.59704/41a8840dd28d2565 |
| URL الوصول: | https://doaj.org/article/45090eb79d5c4d28a471004c5382088d |
| رقم الأكسشن: | edsdoj.45090eb79d5c4d28a471004c5382088d |
| قاعدة البيانات: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
Full Text Finder | تدمد: | 23667044 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.59704/41a8840dd28d2565 |