دورية أكاديمية

Patient backgrounds and short‐term outcomes of complicated appendicitis differ from those of uncomplicated appendicitis

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Patient backgrounds and short‐term outcomes of complicated appendicitis differ from those of uncomplicated appendicitis
المؤلفون: Takuya Oba, Takeshi Yamada, Akihisa Matsuda, Makoto Otani, Shinya Matsuda, Ryo Ohta, Hiroshi Yoshida, Norihiro Sato, Keiji Hirata
المصدر: Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery, Vol 6, Iss 2, Pp 273-281 (2022)
بيانات النشر: Wiley, 2022.
سنة النشر: 2022
المجموعة: LCC:Surgery
LCC:Diseases of the digestive system. Gastroenterology
مصطلحات موضوعية: complicated appendicitis, DPC, interval appendectomy, nationwide database, uncomplicated appendicitis, Surgery, RD1-811, Diseases of the digestive system. Gastroenterology, RC799-869
الوصف: Abstract Background Appendicitis is classified as either complicated (CA) or uncomplicated (UA). Some authors have shown that the epidemiologic trends of CA and UA may differ. The aim of this study was to clarify differences in backgrounds and surgical outcomes between CA and UA patients. Methods This study was a cohort study. We extracted case data from the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) database from January 2014 to December 2017. Patients were classified into three groups, depending on whether they underwent emergency appendectomy for CA (CA group), emergency appendectomy for UA (UA group), or elective appendectomy (EA group). We evaluated patient characteristics and surgical outcomes for each group. Results We included 89,355 adult patients in the study, comprising 29,331 CA, 48,691 UA, and 11,333 EA patients. Old age, larger body mass index, smoking, and medication with antidiabetic drugs, oral corticosteroids, oral antiplatelet drugs, and oral anticoagulant drugs were independent risk factors for CA. The percentage of CA increased with age. In‐hospital mortality (0.15%, 0.02%, and 0.00%) and 30‐d mortality (0.09%, 0.01%, and 0.00%), respectively, of CA patients were significantly higher than those of the UA and EA groups. The duration of postoperative antibiotic administration, duration of fasting, and time before removal of a prophylactic drain were significantly longer in the CA group than in the UA and EA groups. Conclusion Backgrounds and treatment outcomes of CA and UA patients after emergency surgery are entirely different. Thus, the treatment strategy of CA and UA patients should differ accordingly.
نوع الوثيقة: article
وصف الملف: electronic resource
اللغة: English
تدمد: 2475-0328
Relation: https://doaj.org/toc/2475-0328
DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12523
URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/46f8069fb7e340bc935c2d546e920760
رقم الأكسشن: edsdoj.46f8069fb7e340bc935c2d546e920760
قاعدة البيانات: Directory of Open Access Journals
الوصف
تدمد:24750328
DOI:10.1002/ags3.12523