دورية أكاديمية

Imaging-Based Body Fat Distribution in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Imaging-Based Body Fat Distribution in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
المؤلفون: Shiqin Zhu, Zeyan Li, Cuiping Hu, Fengxuan Sun, Chunling Wang, Haitao Yuan, Yan Li
المصدر: Frontiers in Endocrinology, Vol 12 (2021)
بيانات النشر: Frontiers Media S.A., 2021.
سنة النشر: 2021
المجموعة: LCC:Diseases of the endocrine glands. Clinical endocrinology
مصطلحات موضوعية: body fat distribution, central obesity, imaging method, polycystic ovary syndrome, systematic review and meta-analysis, Diseases of the endocrine glands. Clinical endocrinology, RC648-665
الوصف: BackgroundWomen with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) are generally considered to be central obese and at higher risks of metabolic disturbances. Imaging methods are the golden standards for detecting body fat distribution. However, evidence based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) is conflicting. This study systematically reviewed the imaging-based body fat distribution in PCOS patients and quantitatively evaluated the difference in body fat distribution between PCOS and BMI-matched controls.MethodsPUBMED, EMBASE, and Web of Science were searched up to December 2019, and studies quantitatively compared body fat distribution by MRI, CT, ultrasound, or X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) between women with PCOS and their BMI-matched controls were included. Two researchers independently reviewed the articles, extract data and evaluated the study quality based on Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS).Results47 studies were included in systematic review and 39 were eligible for meta-analysis. Compared to BMI-matched controls, higher accumulations of visceral fat (SMD 0.41; 95%CI: 0.23-0.59), abdominal subcutaneous fat (SMD 0.31; 95%CI: 0.20-0.41), total body fat (SMD 0.19; 95% CI: 0.06-0.32), trunk fat (SMD 0.47; 95% CI: 0.17-0.77), and android fat (SMD 0. 36; 95% CI: 0.06-0.66) were identified in PCOS group. However, no significant difference was identified in all the above outcomes in subgroups only including studies using golden standards MRI or CT to evaluate body fat distribution (SMD 0.19; 95%CI: -0.04-0.41 for visceral fat; SMD 0.15; 95%CI: -0.01-0.31 for abdominal subcutaneous fat). Moreover, meta-regression and subgroup analyses showed that young and non-obese patients were more likely to accumulate android fat.ConclusionsPCOS women seem to have abdominal fat accumulation when compared with BMI-matched controls. However, MRI- and CT- assessed fat distribution was similar between PCOS and controls, suggesting central obesity may be independent of PCOS. These findings will help us reappraise the relationship between PCOS and abnormal fat deposition and develop specialized lifestyle interventions for PCOS patients.Systematic Review RegistrationPROSPERO, identifier CRD42018102983.
نوع الوثيقة: article
وصف الملف: electronic resource
اللغة: English
تدمد: 1664-2392
Relation: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fendo.2021.697223/full; https://doaj.org/toc/1664-2392
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.697223
URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/c49422176ac7481ba96a182607e60d84
رقم الأكسشن: edsdoj.49422176ac7481ba96a182607e60d84
قاعدة البيانات: Directory of Open Access Journals
الوصف
تدمد:16642392
DOI:10.3389/fendo.2021.697223