دورية أكاديمية

Evaluation of human-papillomavirus testing and visual inspection for cervical cancer screening in Rwanda

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Evaluation of human-papillomavirus testing and visual inspection for cervical cancer screening in Rwanda
المؤلفون: M. Chantal Umulisa, Silvia Franceschi, Iacopo Baussano, Vanessa Tenet, Mathilde Uwimbabazi, Belson Rugwizangoga, Daniëlle A. M. Heideman, Anne M. Uyterlinde, Teresa M. Darragh, Peter J. F. Snijders, Felix Sayinzoga, Gary M. Clifford
المصدر: BMC Women's Health, Vol 18, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2018)
بيانات النشر: BMC, 2018.
سنة النشر: 2018
المجموعة: LCC:Gynecology and obstetrics
LCC:Public aspects of medicine
مصطلحات موضوعية: Human papillomavirus, Visual inspection, Cervical cancer, Screening, Rwanda, Gynecology and obstetrics, RG1-991, Public aspects of medicine, RA1-1270
الوصف: Abstract Background A pilot screening campaign in Rwanda, based on careHPV-testing followed by visual inspection with acetic acid triage (careHPV+VIA triage), was evaluated against other WHO-recommended screening options, namely HPV screen-and-treat and VIA screen-and-treat. Methods 764 women aged 30-69 underwent at visit 1: i) VIA, and cervical cell collection for ii) careHPV in Rwanda, and iii) liquid-based cytology and GP5+/6+ HR-HPV PCR in The Netherlands. All 177 women positive by VIA, careHPV and/or PCR were recalled, of whom 84% attended. At visit 2, VIA was again used to triage screen-positive women for treatment and to obtain biopsies from all women either from visible lesions or at 12 o’clock of the squamocolumnar junction. Cross-sectional screening indices were estimated primarily against histological high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or worse (hHSIL+), after imputation of missing histology data, based on 1-visit or 2-visit approaches. Results In a 1-visit screen-and-treat approach, VIA had sensitivity and specificity of 41% and 96%, respectively, versus 71% and 88% for careHPV, and 88% and 86% for PCR. In a 2-visit approach (in which hHSIL+ imputed among women without visit 2 were considered untreated) careHPV sensitivity dropped to 59% due to loss of 13% of hHSIL+. For careHPV+VIA triage, sensitivity dropped further to 35%, as another 24% of hHSIL+ were triaged to no treatment. Conclusions CareHPV was not as sensitive as gold-standard PCR, but detected considerably more hHSIL+ than VIA. However, due to careHPV-positive hHSIL+ women being lost to follow-up and/or triaged to no treatment, 2-visit careHPV+VIA triage did not perform better than VIA screen-and-treat.
نوع الوثيقة: article
وصف الملف: electronic resource
اللغة: English
تدمد: 1472-6874
Relation: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12905-018-0549-5; https://doaj.org/toc/1472-6874
DOI: 10.1186/s12905-018-0549-5
URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/4e6da07553954ca09cf8f4ba406cd4d6
رقم الأكسشن: edsdoj.4e6da07553954ca09cf8f4ba406cd4d6
قاعدة البيانات: Directory of Open Access Journals
الوصف
تدمد:14726874
DOI:10.1186/s12905-018-0549-5