دورية أكاديمية

Prognostic Value of Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index in Esophageal Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Prognostic Value of Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index in Esophageal Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
المؤلفون: Jianfeng Zhou, Pinhao Fang, Xiaokun Li, Siyuan Luan, Xin Xiao, Yinmin Gu, Qixin Shang, Hanlu Zhang, Yushang Yang, Xiaoxi Zeng, Yong Yuan
المصدر: Frontiers in Nutrition, Vol 9 (2022)
بيانات النشر: Frontiers Media S.A., 2022.
سنة النشر: 2022
المجموعة: LCC:Nutrition. Foods and food supply
مصطلحات موضوعية: geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI), esophageal carcinoma (EC), prognostic, weight, meta-analysis, Nutrition. Foods and food supply, TX341-641
الوصف: Esophageal cancer (EC) is one of the most common cancers worldwide. Malnutrition often leads to poor prognosis of patients with EC. Geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) was reported as an objective nutrition-related risk index. We intend to comprehensively review evidence of GNRI in predicting EC prognosis. To explore the influence of GNRI on the long-term survival outcome of patients with EC, a meta-analysis was needed. We searched the Web of Science, Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases. The association between prognosis of patients with EC and GNRI was evaluated by pooling hazard ratios (HRs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The fixed model or random model method was chosen according to the heterogeneity among the studies. Totally, 11 studies with 1785 patients who met the inclusion criteria were eventually included in our meta-analysis. Comparing the lower level GNRI group and the higher level GNRI group, the pooled results showed that lower GNRI had a negative impact on overall survival (OS) (HR: 1.75, 95% CI: 1.45–2.10, P < 0.01) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) (HR: 1.77, 95% CI: 1.19–2.62, P < 0.01), indicating that lower GNRI significantly predicted poor OS. In conclusion, lower GNRI could predict the poor prognosis of patients with EC. Meanwhile, more well-designed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are needed to confirm the findings.
نوع الوثيقة: article
وصف الملف: electronic resource
اللغة: English
تدمد: 2296-861X
Relation: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnut.2022.831283/full; https://doaj.org/toc/2296-861X
DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.831283
URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/a52310b4532a454990a33908dfb11a70
رقم الأكسشن: edsdoj.52310b4532a454990a33908dfb11a70
قاعدة البيانات: Directory of Open Access Journals
الوصف
تدمد:2296861X
DOI:10.3389/fnut.2022.831283