BackgroundIndividuals at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis experience subtle emotional disturbances that are traditionally difficult to assess, but natural language processing (NLP) methods may provide novel insight into these symptoms. We predicted that CHR individuals would express more negative emotionality and less emotional language when compared to controls. We also examined associations with symptomatology.MethodsParticipants included 49 CHR individuals and 42 healthy controls who completed a semi-structured narrative interview. Interview transcripts were analyzed using Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) to assess the emotional tone of the language (tone -the ratio of negative to positive language) and count positive/negative words used. Participants also completed clinical symptom assessments to determine CHR status and characterize symptoms (i.e., positive and negative symptom domains).ResultsThe CHR group had more negative emotional tone compared to healthy controls (t=2.676, p=.009), which related to more severe positive symptoms (r2=.323, p=.013). The percentages of positive and negative words did not differ between groups (p’s>.05).ConclusionsLanguage analyses provided accessible, ecologically valid insight into affective dysfunction and psychosis risk symptoms. Natural language processing analyses unmasked differences in language for CHR that captured language tendencies that were more nuanced than the words that are chosen.
Full Text Finder