دورية أكاديمية

Five-years’ prognostic analysis for coronary artery ectasia patients with coronary atherosclerosis: A retrospective cohort study

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Five-years’ prognostic analysis for coronary artery ectasia patients with coronary atherosclerosis: A retrospective cohort study
المؤلفون: Ruifeng Liu, Xiangyu Gao, Siwen Liang, Huiqiang Zhao
المصدر: Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, Vol 9 (2022)
بيانات النشر: Frontiers Media S.A., 2022.
سنة النشر: 2022
المجموعة: LCC:Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system
مصطلحات موضوعية: coronary artery ectasia (CAE), coronary heart disease (CHD), acute myocardial infarction (AMI), major cardiovascular events (MACE), prognosis, Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system, RC666-701
الوصف: BackgroundMost of coronary artery ectasia (CAE) patients have comorbid coronary atherosclerosis. It was lack of prognostic data for CAE patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) and for whom with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).ObjectiveTo determine the overall prognosis for CAE patients.Materials and methodsThis study was a retrospective cohort study. Fifty-one patients with CAE and comorbid AMI (CAE + AMI) and 108 patients with CAE and comorbid CHD (CAE + CHD) were enrolled and matched to non-CAE subjects at a ratio of 1:3 using a propensity score method, respectively. Controls for CAE + AMI group were 153 AMI patients, controls for CAE group were 324 CHD patients and 329 participants with relatively normal coronary arteries (CON). We followed them up to observe major cardiovascular events (MACE).ResultsThe Kaplan-Meier curves showed that the prognosis in CAE + AMI group was worse than in AMI group (5-year non-MACE rate: 62.70% vs. 79.70%, P = 0.010), the prognosis in CAE group was worse than in CHD and CON groups (5-year non-MACE rate: 74.10% vs. 85.80% and 96.70%, respectively, P = 0.000). The main MACEs in CAE + AMI and CAE groups were AMI reoccurrence (19.61% vs. 4.57%, P = 0.002) and re-hospitalization due to repeated angina pectoris (14.81% vs. 8.33% and 2.74%, P = 0.000), respectively. Additionally, the COX regression analysis revealed that the protective factors for preventing MACE in CAE + AMI group included antiplatelet agents (hazard ratio = 0.234, P = 0.016) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor inhibitor (ACEI/ARB, hazard ratio = 0.317, P = 0.037). Whereas the main factor promoting MACE in CAE group was the degree of coronary stenosis (Gensini score, hazard ratio = 1.011, P = 0.022).ConclusionThe prognosis of patients with CAE + AMI was worse than that of those with AMI. The overall prognosis of patients with CAE was worse than that of those with CHD. CAE + AMI and CAE groups had different characteristics; the former was prone to AMI reoccurrence, and the latter was prone to repeated angina pectoris. To prevent MACE, medications, including antiplatelets and ACEI/ARBs, are indicated for patients with CAE + AMI, whereas prevention of the progression of atherosclerotic lesions is indicated for patients with CAE.
نوع الوثيقة: article
وصف الملف: electronic resource
اللغة: English
تدمد: 2297-055X
Relation: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2022.950291/full; https://doaj.org/toc/2297-055X
DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.950291
URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/d56b06f1633f494990f70e66d1d37065
رقم الأكسشن: edsdoj.56b06f1633f494990f70e66d1d37065
قاعدة البيانات: Directory of Open Access Journals
الوصف
تدمد:2297055X
DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2022.950291