دورية أكاديمية

Estimating life expectancy adjusted by self-rated health status in the United States: national health interview survey linked to the mortality

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Estimating life expectancy adjusted by self-rated health status in the United States: national health interview survey linked to the mortality
المؤلفون: Hyunsoon Cho, Zhuoqiao Wang, K. Robin Yabroff, Benmei Liu, Timothy McNeel, Eric J. Feuer, Angela B. Mariotto
المصدر: BMC Public Health, Vol 22, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2022)
بيانات النشر: BMC, 2022.
سنة النشر: 2022
المجموعة: LCC:Public aspects of medicine
مصطلحات موضوعية: Self-rated health status, Life expectancy, Survival, Mortality, health survey, National Health Interview Survey, Public aspects of medicine, RA1-1270
الوصف: Abstract Background Life expectancy is increasingly incorporated in evidence-based screening and treatment guidelines to facilitate patient-centered clinical decision-making. However, life expectancy estimates from standard life tables do not account for health status, an important prognostic factor for premature death. This study aims to address this research gap and develop life tables incorporating the health status of adults in the United States. Methods Data from the National Health Interview Survey (1986–2004) linked to mortality follow-up through to 2006 (age ≥ 40, n = 729,531) were used to develop life tables. The impact of self-rated health (excellent, very good, good, fair, poor) on survival was quantified in 5-year age groups, incorporating complex survey design and weights. Life expectancies were estimated by extrapolating the modeled survival probabilities. Results Life expectancies incorporating health status differed substantially from standard US life tables and by health status. Poor self-rated health more significantly affected the survival of younger compared to older individuals, resulting in substantial decreases in life expectancy. At age 40 years, hazards of dying for white men who reported poor vs. excellent health was 8.5 (95% CI: 7.0,10.3) times greater, resulting in a 23-year difference in life expectancy (poor vs. excellent: 22 vs. 45), while at age 80 years, the hazards ratio was 2.4 (95% CI: 2.1, 2.8) and life expectancy difference was 5 years (5 vs. 10). Relative to the US general population, life expectancies of adults (age
نوع الوثيقة: article
وصف الملف: electronic resource
اللغة: English
تدمد: 1471-2458
Relation: https://doaj.org/toc/1471-2458
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-12332-0
URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/59c622eea77c4726a1e1557148dfab36
رقم الأكسشن: edsdoj.59c622eea77c4726a1e1557148dfab36
قاعدة البيانات: Directory of Open Access Journals
الوصف
تدمد:14712458
DOI:10.1186/s12889-021-12332-0