دورية أكاديمية

Clinical implementation of PLANET® Dose for dosimetric assessment after [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE: comparison with Dosimetry Toolkit® and OLINDA/EXM® V1.0

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Clinical implementation of PLANET® Dose for dosimetric assessment after [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE: comparison with Dosimetry Toolkit® and OLINDA/EXM® V1.0
المؤلفون: Lore Santoro, L. Pitalot, D. Trauchessec, E. Mora-Ramirez, P. O. Kotzki, M. Bardiès, E. Deshayes
المصدر: EJNMMI Research, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-17 (2021)
بيانات النشر: SpringerOpen, 2021.
سنة النشر: 2021
المجموعة: LCC:Medical physics. Medical radiology. Nuclear medicine
مصطلحات موضوعية: Dosimetry workstation, Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE, 3D calibration factor, MIRD, Voxel-based dosimetry, Medical physics. Medical radiology. Nuclear medicine, R895-920
الوصف: Abstract Background The aim of this study was to compare a commercial dosimetry workstation (PLANET® Dose) and the dosimetry approach (GE Dosimetry Toolkit® and OLINDA/EXM® V1.0) currently used in our department for quantification of the absorbed dose (AD) to organs at risk after peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE. Methods An evaluation on phantom was performed to determine the SPECT calibration factor variations over time and to compare the Time Integrated Activity Coefficients (TIACs) obtained with the two approaches. Then, dosimetry was carried out with the two tools in 21 patients with neuroendocrine tumours after the first and second injection of 7.2 ± 0.2 GBq of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE (40 dosimetry analyses with each software). SPECT/CT images were acquired at 4 h, 24 h, 72 h and 192 h post-injection and were reconstructed using the Xeleris software (General Electric). The liver, spleen and kidneys masses and TIACs were determined using Dosimetry Toolkit® (DTK) and PLANET® Dose. The ADs were calculated using OLINDA/EXM® V1.0 and the Local Deposition Method (LDM) or Dose voxel-Kernel convolution (DK) on PLANET® Dose. Results With the phantom, the 3D calibration factors showed a slight variation (0.8% and 3.3%) over time, and TIACs of 225.19 h and 217.52 h were obtained with DTK and PLANET® Dose, respectively. In patients, the root mean square deviation value was 8.9% for the organ masses, 8.1% for the TIACs, and 9.1% and 7.8% for the ADs calculated with LDM and DK, respectively. The Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient was 0.99 and the Bland–Altman plot analysis estimated that the AD value difference between methods ranged from − 0.75 to 0.49 Gy, from − 0.20 to 0.64 Gy, and from − 0.43 to 1.03 Gy for 95% of the 40 liver, kidneys and spleen dosimetry analyses. The dosimetry method had a minor influence on AD differences compared with the image registration and organ segmentation steps. Conclusions The ADs to organs at risk obtained with the new workstation PLANET® Dose are concordant with those calculated with the currently used software and in agreement with the literature. These results validate the use of PLANET® Dose in clinical routine for patient dosimetry after targeted radiotherapy with [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE.
نوع الوثيقة: article
وصف الملف: electronic resource
اللغة: English
تدمد: 2191-219X
Relation: https://doaj.org/toc/2191-219X
DOI: 10.1186/s13550-020-00737-8
URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/5aecc2ed87134d089168f16df155dab0
رقم الأكسشن: edsdoj.5aecc2ed87134d089168f16df155dab0
قاعدة البيانات: Directory of Open Access Journals
الوصف
تدمد:2191219X
DOI:10.1186/s13550-020-00737-8