دورية أكاديمية

Comparative study of sonourethrography and conventional urethrography in determining the length of anterior urethral strictures

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Comparative study of sonourethrography and conventional urethrography in determining the length of anterior urethral strictures
المؤلفون: Elendu KC, Uwanuruochi K, Umeh E, Umeokafor C, Nwammuo C, Nwosu C, Mbaeri TU
المصدر: Ibom Medical Journal, Vol 17, Iss 1 (2024)
بيانات النشر: Nigerian Medical Association, Akwa Ibom State Branch, 2024.
سنة النشر: 2024
المجموعة: LCC:Medicine
مصطلحات موضوعية: Sonourethrogram, Conventional urethrogram, Stricture length and diameter, Medicine
الوصف: Background: Conventional urethrography has been the “Gold standard” in the evaluation of anterior urethral strictures. Sonourethrography (SUG) is less invasive, more readily available, and cheaper and does not use ionizing radiation. Objective: To determine the length of anterior urethral strictures diagnosed on conventional urethrography using SUG and compare findings on SUG with conventional urethrography in adult male patients Methodology: This was a prospective cross-sectional study carried out over a period of twelve months, whereby 66 male patients with clinically suspected anterior urethral strictures and confirmed on retrograde urethrography (RUG)/ Micturatingcystourethrography (MCUG) were examined using SUG. The length of anterior urethral strictures from both procedures were compared. The data analysis was done using statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) version 23(SPSS Inc, IL, USA). At 95% confidence interval, P-value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Result: Sixty six patients were studied. The mean age of the participants was 56.7±13.7years with an age range of 20 – 78 years. The stricture lengths and diameters were consistently higher on SUG compared to conventional urethrography. The mean length of stricture on RUG/MCUG and SUG were 19.4 ± 6.0mm and 21.3± 6.7 mm respectfully. The mean difference for the stricture lengths on RUG/MCUG and SUG was 1.9 mm and this was statistically significant (CI = 0.983 – 2.761, p < 0.001). The mean diameter of the stricture on RUG/MCUG and SUG were 2.2± 0.7mm and 5.6± 1.2mm and the mean difference for the stricture diameter on both techniques was 3.4mm (CI= 3.158 – 3.577, p
نوع الوثيقة: article
وصف الملف: electronic resource
اللغة: English
تدمد: 1597-7188
2735-9964
Relation: https://ibommedicaljournal.org/index.php/imjhome/article/view/389; https://doaj.org/toc/1597-7188; https://doaj.org/toc/2735-9964
DOI: 10.61386/imj.v17i1.389
URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/5e267547672e450ebb2116a569c42bab
رقم الأكسشن: edsdoj.5e267547672e450ebb2116a569c42bab
قاعدة البيانات: Directory of Open Access Journals
الوصف
تدمد:15977188
27359964
DOI:10.61386/imj.v17i1.389