دورية أكاديمية

Vaccines for all: A formative evaluation of a multistakeholder community-engaged COVID-19 vaccine outreach clinic for migrant communities

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Vaccines for all: A formative evaluation of a multistakeholder community-engaged COVID-19 vaccine outreach clinic for migrant communities
المؤلفون: Linda E. Holdbrook, Nour Hassan, Sarah K. Clarke, Annalee Coakley, Eric Norrie, Mussie Yemane, Michael R. Youssef, Adanech Sahilie, Minnella Antonio, Edna Ramirez Cerino, Sachin R. Pendharkar, Deidre Lake, Denise L. Spitzer, Kevin Pottie, Samuel T. Edwards, Gabriel E. Fabreau
المصدر: Journal of Migration and Health, Vol 7, Iss , Pp 100188- (2023)
بيانات النشر: Elsevier, 2023.
سنة النشر: 2023
المجموعة: LCC:Public aspects of medicine
LCC:Colonies and colonization. Emigration and immigration. International migration
مصطلحات موضوعية: Vaccine equity, Community-engaged, Migrants, COVID-19, CBPR, Vaccine hesitancy, Public aspects of medicine, RA1-1270, Colonies and colonization. Emigration and immigration. International migration, JV1-9480
الوصف: Background: Racialized, low-income, and migrant populations experience persistent barriers to vaccines against COVID-19. These communities in East and Northeast Calgary were disproportionately impacted by COVID-19, yet faced vaccine access barriers. Diverse multi-stakeholder coalitions and community partnerships can improve vaccine outreach strategies, but how stakeholders perceive these models is unknown. Methods: We conducted a formative evaluation of a low-barrier, community-engaged vaccine outreach clinic in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, on June 5–6, 2021. We delivered an online post-clinic survey to clinic stakeholders, to assess whether the clinic achieved its collectively derived pre-specified goals (effective, efficient, patient-centered, and safe), to asses whether the clinic model was scalable, and to solicit improvement recommendations. Survey responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. Results: Overall, 166/195 (85%) stakeholders responded. The majority were from non-healthcare positions (59%), between 30 and 49 years of age (87/136; 64%), and self-identified as racialized individuals (96/136; 71%). Respondents felt the clinic was effective (99.2%), efficient (96.9%), patient-centered (92.3%), and safe (90.8%), and that the outreach model was scalable 94.6% (123/130). There were no differences across stakeholder categories. The open-ended survey responses supported the scale responses. Improvement suggestions describe increased time for clinic planning and promotion, more multilingual staff, and further efforts to reduce accessibility barriers, such as priority check-in for people with disabilities. Conclusion: Diverse stakeholders almost universally felt that this community-engaged COVID-19 vaccine outreach clinic achieved its goals and was scalable. These findings support the value of community-engaged outreach to improve vaccine equity among other marginalized newcomer communities.
نوع الوثيقة: article
وصف الملف: electronic resource
اللغة: English
تدمد: 2666-6235
Relation: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666623523000387; https://doaj.org/toc/2666-6235
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmh.2023.100188
URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/611f10fbf8d247038713f87584ffd19e
رقم الأكسشن: edsdoj.611f10fbf8d247038713f87584ffd19e
قاعدة البيانات: Directory of Open Access Journals
الوصف
تدمد:26666235
DOI:10.1016/j.jmh.2023.100188