دورية أكاديمية

Deep learning assessment compared to radiologist reporting for metastatic spinal cord compression on CT

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Deep learning assessment compared to radiologist reporting for metastatic spinal cord compression on CT
المؤلفون: James Thomas Patrick Decourcy Hallinan, Lei Zhu, Wenqiao Zhang, Shuliang Ge, Faimee Erwan Muhamat Nor, Han Yang Ong, Sterling Ellis Eide, Amanda J. L. Cheng, Tricia Kuah, Desmond Shi Wei Lim, Xi Zhen Low, Kuan Yuen Yeong, Mona I. AlMuhaish, Ahmed Mohamed Alsooreti, Nesaretnam Barr Kumarakulasinghe, Ee Chin Teo, Qai Ven Yap, Yiong Huak Chan, Shuxun Lin, Jiong Hao Tan, Naresh Kumar, Balamurugan A. Vellayappan, Beng Chin Ooi, Swee Tian Quek, Andrew Makmur
المصدر: Frontiers in Oncology, Vol 13 (2023)
بيانات النشر: Frontiers Media S.A., 2023.
سنة النشر: 2023
المجموعة: LCC:Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens
مصطلحات موضوعية: metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC), Epidural spinal cord compression, metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC), spinal metastatic disease, deep learning, artificial intelligence, Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens, RC254-282
الوصف: IntroductionMetastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) is a disastrous complication of advanced malignancy. A deep learning (DL) algorithm for MSCC classification on CT could expedite timely diagnosis. In this study, we externally test a DL algorithm for MSCC classification on CT and compare with radiologist assessment.MethodsRetrospective collection of CT and corresponding MRI from patients with suspected MSCC was conducted from September 2007 to September 2020. Exclusion criteria were scans with instrumentation, no intravenous contrast, motion artefacts and non-thoracic coverage. Internal CT dataset split was 84% for training/validation and 16% for testing. An external test set was also utilised. Internal training/validation sets were labelled by radiologists with spine imaging specialization (6 and 11-years post-board certification) and were used to further develop a DL algorithm for MSCC classification. The spine imaging specialist (11-years expertise) labelled the test sets (reference standard). For evaluation of DL algorithm performance, internal and external test data were independently reviewed by four radiologists: two spine specialists (Rad1 and Rad2, 7 and 5-years post-board certification, respectively) and two oncological imaging specialists (Rad3 and Rad4, 3 and 5-years post-board certification, respectively). DL model performance was also compared against the CT report issued by the radiologist in a real clinical setting. Inter-rater agreement (Gwet’s kappa) and sensitivity/specificity/AUCs were calculated.ResultsOverall, 420 CT scans were evaluated (225 patients, mean age=60 ± 11.9[SD]); 354(84%) CTs for training/validation and 66(16%) CTs for internal testing. The DL algorithm showed high inter-rater agreement for three-class MSCC grading with kappas of 0.872 (p
نوع الوثيقة: article
وصف الملف: electronic resource
اللغة: English
تدمد: 2234-943X
Relation: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2023.1151073/full; https://doaj.org/toc/2234-943X
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1151073
URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/dee62df23f25449a9ee1011c2c962a58
رقم الأكسشن: edsdoj.62df23f25449a9ee1011c2c962a58
قاعدة البيانات: Directory of Open Access Journals
الوصف
تدمد:2234943X
DOI:10.3389/fonc.2023.1151073