دورية أكاديمية

High or low temperature extraction, which is more conducive to Triphala against chronic pharyngitis?

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: High or low temperature extraction, which is more conducive to Triphala against chronic pharyngitis?
المؤلفون: Fei Ran, Xue Han, Xuan Deng, Zhenfeng Wu, Haozhou Huang, Ming Qiu, Jiao Song, Xichuan Wei, Dingkung Zhang, Yu Wang, Sanhu Fan, Junzhi Lin, Li Han
المصدر: Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, Vol 140, Iss , Pp 111787- (2021)
بيانات النشر: Elsevier, 2021.
سنة النشر: 2021
المجموعة: LCC:Therapeutics. Pharmacology
مصطلحات موضوعية: Triphala, Decompressing inner ebullition, Reflux extraction, Chronic pharyngitis, Therapeutics. Pharmacology, RM1-950
الوصف: Objective: Explore the effects of high-temperature reflux extraction and low-temperature decompressing inner ebullition on Triphala's chemical composition and anti-chronic pharyngitis activity. Methods: The network pharmacology was used to analyze the material basis, targets and pathways of Triphala for chronic pharyngitis. HPLC were used to compare the fingerprint profile and content of components between the two extracts. The antioxidant and anti-chronic pharyngitis activities of the two extracts were compared by DPPH assay and ammonia induced chronic pharyngitis model in rats. Results: The network pharmacology results showed that the active ingredients of Triphala for chronic pharyngitis are epigallocatechin-3-gallate, (+)-catechin, epicatechin, epicatechin gallate, (+)-gallocatechin, quercetin, luteolin, leucodelphinidin and other flavonoids; phenolic acids such as gallic acid and ellagic acid; alkaloids such as ellipticine, cheilanthifoline; hydrolyzed tannins such as corilagin and chebulic acid. The high-temperature reflux extract and the low-temperature decompressing inner ebullition extract have extremely significant differences in the fingerprint profile. Among them, the content of gallic acid, ellagic acid, chebulic acid, catechin, epicatechin, corilagin, quercetin, and epicatechin gallate in the reflux extract is 1.1–5.3 times as much as decompressing inner ebullition extract. The free radical scavenging ability of reflux extract is significantly stronger than that of decompression extract (p
نوع الوثيقة: article
وصف الملف: electronic resource
اللغة: English
تدمد: 0753-3322
Relation: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0753332221005692; https://doaj.org/toc/0753-3322
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2021.111787
URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/643369a3f5174178b0469f98b1e29e15
رقم الأكسشن: edsdoj.643369a3f5174178b0469f98b1e29e15
قاعدة البيانات: Directory of Open Access Journals
الوصف
تدمد:07533322
DOI:10.1016/j.biopha.2021.111787