دورية أكاديمية

The international food unit: a new measurement aid that can improve portion size estimation

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: The international food unit: a new measurement aid that can improve portion size estimation
المؤلفون: T. Bucher, M. Weltert, M.E. Rollo, S.P. Smith, W. Jia, C.E. Collins, M. Sun
المصدر: International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, Vol 14, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2017)
بيانات النشر: BMC, 2017.
سنة النشر: 2017
المجموعة: LCC:Nutritional diseases. Deficiency diseases
LCC:Public aspects of medicine
مصطلحات موضوعية: Portion size measurement aid, PSMA, PSEM, Volume and capacity training, Standardisation, Dietary assessment, Nutritional diseases. Deficiency diseases, RC620-627, Public aspects of medicine, RA1-1270
الوصف: Abstract Background Portion size education tools, aids and interventions can be effective in helping prevent weight gain. However consumers have difficulties in estimating food portion sizes and are confused by inconsistencies in measurement units and terminologies currently used. Visual cues are an important mediator of portion size estimation, but standardized measurement units are required. In the current study, we present a new food volume estimation tool and test the ability of young adults to accurately quantify food volumes. The International Food Unit™ (IFU™) is a 4x4x4 cm cube (64cm3), subdivided into eight 2 cm sub-cubes for estimating smaller food volumes. Compared with currently used measures such as cups and spoons, the IFU™ standardizes estimation of food volumes with metric measures. The IFU™ design is based on binary dimensional increments and the cubic shape facilitates portion size education and training, memory and recall, and computer processing which is binary in nature. Methods The performance of the IFU™ was tested in a randomized between-subject experiment (n = 128 adults, 66 men) that estimated volumes of 17 foods using four methods; the IFU™ cube, a deformable modelling clay cube, a household measuring cup or no aid (weight estimation). Estimation errors were compared between groups using Kruskall-Wallis tests and post-hoc comparisons. Results Estimation errors differed significantly between groups (H(3) = 28.48, p
نوع الوثيقة: article
وصف الملف: electronic resource
اللغة: English
تدمد: 1479-5868
Relation: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12966-017-0583-y; https://doaj.org/toc/1479-5868
DOI: 10.1186/s12966-017-0583-y
URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/6459d2003d294857a3bda6e87d6d29d9
رقم الأكسشن: edsdoj.6459d2003d294857a3bda6e87d6d29d9
قاعدة البيانات: Directory of Open Access Journals
الوصف
تدمد:14795868
DOI:10.1186/s12966-017-0583-y