دورية أكاديمية
The international food unit: a new measurement aid that can improve portion size estimation
العنوان: | The international food unit: a new measurement aid that can improve portion size estimation |
---|---|
المؤلفون: | T. Bucher, M. Weltert, M.E. Rollo, S.P. Smith, W. Jia, C.E. Collins, M. Sun |
المصدر: | International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, Vol 14, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2017) |
بيانات النشر: | BMC, 2017. |
سنة النشر: | 2017 |
المجموعة: | LCC:Nutritional diseases. Deficiency diseases LCC:Public aspects of medicine |
مصطلحات موضوعية: | Portion size measurement aid, PSMA, PSEM, Volume and capacity training, Standardisation, Dietary assessment, Nutritional diseases. Deficiency diseases, RC620-627, Public aspects of medicine, RA1-1270 |
الوصف: | Abstract Background Portion size education tools, aids and interventions can be effective in helping prevent weight gain. However consumers have difficulties in estimating food portion sizes and are confused by inconsistencies in measurement units and terminologies currently used. Visual cues are an important mediator of portion size estimation, but standardized measurement units are required. In the current study, we present a new food volume estimation tool and test the ability of young adults to accurately quantify food volumes. The International Food Unit™ (IFU™) is a 4x4x4 cm cube (64cm3), subdivided into eight 2 cm sub-cubes for estimating smaller food volumes. Compared with currently used measures such as cups and spoons, the IFU™ standardizes estimation of food volumes with metric measures. The IFU™ design is based on binary dimensional increments and the cubic shape facilitates portion size education and training, memory and recall, and computer processing which is binary in nature. Methods The performance of the IFU™ was tested in a randomized between-subject experiment (n = 128 adults, 66 men) that estimated volumes of 17 foods using four methods; the IFU™ cube, a deformable modelling clay cube, a household measuring cup or no aid (weight estimation). Estimation errors were compared between groups using Kruskall-Wallis tests and post-hoc comparisons. Results Estimation errors differed significantly between groups (H(3) = 28.48, p |
نوع الوثيقة: | article |
وصف الملف: | electronic resource |
اللغة: | English |
تدمد: | 1479-5868 |
Relation: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12966-017-0583-y; https://doaj.org/toc/1479-5868 |
DOI: | 10.1186/s12966-017-0583-y |
URL الوصول: | https://doaj.org/article/6459d2003d294857a3bda6e87d6d29d9 |
رقم الأكسشن: | edsdoj.6459d2003d294857a3bda6e87d6d29d9 |
قاعدة البيانات: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
تدمد: | 14795868 |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.1186/s12966-017-0583-y |