دورية أكاديمية

Ponatinib as a Prophylactic or Pre-Emptive Strategy to Prevent Cytological Relapse after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Transplanted in Complete Cytological Remission

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Ponatinib as a Prophylactic or Pre-Emptive Strategy to Prevent Cytological Relapse after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Transplanted in Complete Cytological Remission
المؤلفون: Anna Candoni, Patrizia Chiusolo, Davide Lazzarotto, Chiara Sartor, Michelina Dargenio, Sabina Chiaretti, Cristina Skert, Fabio Giglio, Silvia Trappolini, Nicola Stefano Fracchiolla, Sara Medici, Paola Bresciani, Angela Cuoghi, Cristina Papayannidis
المصدر: Cancers, Vol 16, Iss 11, p 2108 (2024)
بيانات النشر: MDPI AG, 2024.
سنة النشر: 2024
المجموعة: LCC:Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens
مصطلحات موضوعية: acute lymphoblastic leukemia, ponatinib, TKI, allogeneic stem cell transplantation, Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens, RC254-282
الوصف: The administration of TKIs after Allo-SCT in Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph + ALL) remains controversial, and the TKI approach (prophylactic, pre-emptive or salvage) is still heterogeneous in transplant centers. In this context, very little is known about the feasibility and safety of third-generation TKIs. In this paper, we analyze the efficacy and safety of ponatinib (PONA) administered after Allo-SCT to prevent cytologic relapse of Ph + ALL. This is a multicenter observational study including 48 patients (pts) with Ph + ALL (median age 49 years) who received PONA after Allo-SCT while in complete cytological remission (cCR); 26 (54%) had positive minimal residual disease (MRD pos) before Allo-SCT. PONA was administered after Allo-SCT prophylactically (starting with MRD neg) in 26 pts or pre-emptively (starting with MRD pos post-SCT and without hematological relapse) in 22 pts. Patients treated prophylactically with PONA started treatment earlier, at a median of 4.3 months (range 1.5–6) after Allo-SCT, than those treated pre-emptively, who started PONA at a median of 7.4 months (range 2–63) after Allo-SCT (p = 0.01). The median starting dose of PONA was 30 mg/day (range 15–45). A dose reduction was required in 10/48 (21%) of cases, but a permanent discontinuation of PONA, due to toxicity, was required in only 5/48 pts (10.5%). No deaths due to PONA-related adverse events (AEs) were reported. The median follow-up time after Allo-SCT was 34 months (range 7.7–118). At the last follow-up, the median duration of PONA therapy was 22 months (range 2–100). The 5-year OS and RFS after Allo-SCT were 92% and 71%, respectively. The 5-year RFS after Allo-SCT of pts who received PONA prophylaxis was 95%, and it was 57% for those who received PONA pre-emptively (log-rank p = 0.02). In conclusion, this multicenter analysis of 48 patients with Ph + ALL undergoing Allo-SCT while in CcR, although with the caution of the retrospective data, supports the feasibility of PONA maintenance strategy after Allo-SCT with a low rate of discontinuations (10.5%) due to PONA-related AE.
نوع الوثيقة: article
وصف الملف: electronic resource
اللغة: English
تدمد: 2072-6694
Relation: https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/16/11/2108; https://doaj.org/toc/2072-6694
DOI: 10.3390/cancers16112108
URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/c6afb54a72a84b378d495a761620562c
رقم الأكسشن: edsdoj.6afb54a72a84b378d495a761620562c
قاعدة البيانات: Directory of Open Access Journals
الوصف
تدمد:20726694
DOI:10.3390/cancers16112108