دورية أكاديمية
Minimal extracorporeal circulation: An appraisal from a private practice
| العنوان: | Minimal extracorporeal circulation: An appraisal from a private practice |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Swart, Marius, Joubert, Gina |
| المصدر: | SA Heart Journal, Vol 16, Iss 1, Pp 22-27 (2019) |
| بيانات النشر: | South African Heart Association, 2019. |
| سنة النشر: | 2019 |
| المجموعة: | LCC:Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | Cardio-pulmonary bypass, minimal extracorporeal circulation, private, Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system, RC666-701 |
| الوصف: | Introduction: The systemic infl ammatory response associated with cardio-pulmonary bypass (CPB) is detrimental to organ function in varying degrees. Minimal extracorporeal circulation (MECC) assumes an attenuation of these deleterious effects. The aim of this study was to compare conventional CPB (CCPB) with MECC, in a population of patients who had their CABG done in a private practice in South Africa. Methods: Two historical cohort analytical studies were done on patients who had isolated CABG done by one surgeon in the Mediclinic Bloemfontein. Patients who had their CABG done using CCPB were compared statistically using logistic regression to those who had their CABG done with MECC. A propensity score matching was also used to compare the 2 groups. In a second follow-up study, a once-off lactate on arrival in the intensive care unit was compared. A qualitative assessment of the technique by the various role-players in theatre was added to the initial study. Results: The primary CCPB group had 1 572 patients. The MECC group comprised 367 patients. No statistically signifi cant outcome difference was found in terms of mortality, major morbidity, post-operative blood loss or usage of homologous blood. Once the 2 groups were evenly matched, patients with MECC had a better serum creatinine postoperatively, but renal dialysis could not be avoided. Patients with MECC also had a statistically shorter hospital stay. The second study (CCPB n=63 and MECC n=100) confi rmed the shorter hospital stay. There was no difference in the lactate value between the 2 groups. In general, there are varying levels of enthusiasm among the theatre specialists for a MECC strategy. Conclusions: MECC protects the kidneys, but not so much against renal dialysis. MECC patients could stay for a somewhat shorter time in hospital. Tissue perfusion based on a once-off lactate level was equal. MECC might be technically more demanding. This article is an important addition to the literature that adds a local perspective. |
| نوع الوثيقة: | article |
| وصف الملف: | electronic resource |
| اللغة: | English |
| تدمد: | 1996-6741 2071-4602 |
| Relation: | https://www.journals.ac.za/index.php/SAHJ/article/view/3408; https://doaj.org/toc/1996-6741; https://doaj.org/toc/2071-4602 |
| DOI: | 10.24170/16-1-3408 |
| URL الوصول: | https://doaj.org/article/6b63b47329694a678d8b827eedfa9c70 |
| رقم الأكسشن: | edsdoj.6b63b47329694a678d8b827eedfa9c70 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
Full Text Finder | تدمد: | 19966741 20714602 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.24170/16-1-3408 |