دورية أكاديمية

Excitatory Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Over the Ipsilesional Hemisphere for Upper Limb Motor Function After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Excitatory Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Over the Ipsilesional Hemisphere for Upper Limb Motor Function After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
المؤلفون: Zhiqing Tang, Kaiyue Han, Rongrong Wang, Yue Zhang, Hao Zhang
المصدر: Frontiers in Neurology, Vol 13 (2022)
بيانات النشر: Frontiers Media S.A., 2022.
سنة النشر: 2022
المجموعة: LCC:Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system
مصطلحات موضوعية: stroke, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, upper limb, motor function, meta-analysis, Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system, RC346-429
الوصف: BackgroundRepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a promising therapy to promote recovery of the upper limb after stroke. According to the regulation of cortical excitability, rTMS can be divided into excitatory rTMS and inhibitory rTMS, and excitatory rTMS includes high-frequency rTMS (HF-rTMS) or intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS). We aimed to evaluate the effects of excitatory rTMS over the ipsilesional hemisphere on upper limb motor recovery after stroke.MethodsDatabases of PubMed, Embase, ISI Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials published before 31 December 2021. RCTs on the effects of HF-rTMS or iTBS on upper limb function in patients diagnosed with stroke were included. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted the data, and assessed quality. The meta-analysis was performed by using Review Manager Version 5.4 software.ResultsFifteen studies with 449 participants were included in this meta-analysis. This meta-analysis found that excitatory rTMS had significant efficacy on upper limb motor function (MD = 5.88, 95% CI, 3.32–8.43, P < 0.001), hand strength (SMD = 0.53, 95% CI, 0.04–1.01, P = 0.03), and hand dexterity (SMD = 0.76, 95% CI, 0.39–1.14, P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses based on different types of rTMS showed that both iTBS and HF-rTMS significantly promoted upper limb motor function (iTBS, P < 0.001; HF-rTMS, P < 0.001) and hand dexterity (iTBS, P = 0.01; HF-rTMS, P < 0.001) but not hand strength (iTBS, P = 0.07; HF-rTMS, P = 0.12). Further subgroup analysis based on the duration of illness demonstrated that applying excitatory rTMS during the first 3 months (
نوع الوثيقة: article
وصف الملف: electronic resource
اللغة: English
تدمد: 1664-2295
Relation: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2022.918597/full; https://doaj.org/toc/1664-2295
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.918597
URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/75082180eb224bcabe0f84c49dc79c9e
رقم الأكسشن: edsdoj.75082180eb224bcabe0f84c49dc79c9e
قاعدة البيانات: Directory of Open Access Journals
الوصف
تدمد:16642295
DOI:10.3389/fneur.2022.918597