دورية أكاديمية

Unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF) versus endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (Endo-TLIF) in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis along with intervertebral disc herniation: a retrospective analysis

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF) versus endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (Endo-TLIF) in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis along with intervertebral disc herniation: a retrospective analysis
المؤلفون: Zuoran Fan, Xiaolin Wu, Zhu Guo, Nana Shen, Bohua Chen, Hongfei Xiang
المصدر: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, Vol 25, Iss 1, Pp 1-14 (2024)
بيانات النشر: BMC, 2024.
سنة النشر: 2024
المجموعة: LCC:Diseases of the musculoskeletal system
مصطلحات موضوعية: Lumbar spinal stenosis, Unilateral biportal endoscopy technique, Endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, Health-related quality of life, Spinal canal volume, Rate of interbody fusion, Diseases of the musculoskeletal system, RC925-935
الوصف: Abstract Objective This study aims to compare the clinical effects and imaging data of patients who underwent endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (Endo-TLIF) with those who received unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF). Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 69 patients presenting with typical intermittent claudication and signs and symptoms indicative of unilateral lower extremity nerve root compression, meeting inclusion criteria between April 2022 and June 2022. Among the cohort, 35 patients underwent ULIF group, while 34 patients underwent Endo-TLIF group. We compared perioperative parameters, including intraoperative blood loss, duration of hospital stay, and operation time between the two groups. Pre-operative and post-operative changes in the height and cross-sectional area of the target intervertebral space were also compared between the groups. Finally, we evaluated bone graft size and interbody fusion rates at 6 and 12 months post-surgery using the Brantigan scoring system. Results The ULIF group had significantly shorter operative times compared to the Endo-TLIF group (P 0.05). Furthermore, both groups exhibited postoperative increases in vertebral canal volume compared to baseline (P 0.05). Interbody fusion rates were comparable between the two groups at both 6 and 12 months after surgery (P > 0.05). Lastly, the ULIF group had a significantly larger area of bone graft than the Endo-TLIF group (P
نوع الوثيقة: article
وصف الملف: electronic resource
اللغة: English
تدمد: 1471-2474
Relation: https://doaj.org/toc/1471-2474
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07287-3
URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/7661ec2018b546f2acb0cc3281d87db1
رقم الأكسشن: edsdoj.7661ec2018b546f2acb0cc3281d87db1
قاعدة البيانات: Directory of Open Access Journals
الوصف
تدمد:14712474
DOI:10.1186/s12891-024-07287-3