دورية أكاديمية
Do Electrical Stimulation Devices Reduce Pain and Improve Function?—A Comparative Review
| العنوان: | Do Electrical Stimulation Devices Reduce Pain and Improve Function?—A Comparative Review |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Christian B. Allen, Tyler K. Williamson, Stephen M. Norwood, Ashim Gupta |
| المصدر: | Pain and Therapy, Vol 12, Iss 6, Pp 1339-1354 (2023) |
| بيانات النشر: | Adis, Springer Healthcare, 2023. |
| سنة النشر: | 2023 |
| المجموعة: | LCC:Anesthesiology |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | Chronic pain, Function, Effectiveness, Electrical stimulation, Neuromuscular electrical stimulation, Functional electrical stimulation, Anesthesiology, RD78.3-87.3 |
| الوصف: | Abstract Background Multiple forms of electrical stimulation (ES) potentially offer widely varying clinical benefits. Diminished function commonly associated with acute and chronic pain lessens productivity and increases medical costs. This review aims to compare the relative effects of various forms of ES on functional and pain outcomes. Methods A comprehensive literature search focused on studies of commonly marketed forms of ES used for treatment of pain and improvement of function. Peer-reviewed manuscripts were categorized as “Important” (systematic review or meta-analysis, randomized controlled trial, observational cohort study) and “Minor” (retrospective case series, case report, opinion review) for each identified form of ES. Results and Discussion Varying forms of ES have markedly different technical parameters, applications, and indications, based on clinically meaningful impact on pain perception, function improvement, and medication reduction. Despite being around for decades, there is limited quality evidence for most forms of ES, although there are several notable exceptions for treatment of specific indications. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) has well-demonstrated beneficial effects for rehabilitation of selective spinal cord injured (SCI), post-stroke, and debilitated inpatients. Functional electrical stimulation (FES) has similarly shown effectiveness in rehabilitation of some stroke, SCI, and foot drop outpatients. H-Wave® device stimulation (HWDS) has moderate supportive evidence for treatment of acute and refractory chronic pain, consistently demonstrating improvements in function and pain measures across diverse populations. Interestingly, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), the most widely used form of ES, demonstrated insignificant or very low levels of pain and functional improvement. Conclusion Ten of 13 reviewed forms of ES have only limited quality evidence for clinically significant reduction of pain or improvement of function across different patient populations. NMES and FES have reasonably demonstrated effectiveness, albeit for specific clinical rehabilitation indications. HWDS was associated with the most clinically significant outcomes, in terms of functional improvement combined with reduction of pain and medication use. More rigorous long-term clinical trials are needed to further validate appropriate use and specific indications for most forms of ES. Level of Evidence II. |
| نوع الوثيقة: | article |
| وصف الملف: | electronic resource |
| اللغة: | English |
| تدمد: | 2193-8237 2193-651X |
| Relation: | https://doaj.org/toc/2193-8237; https://doaj.org/toc/2193-651X |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s40122-023-00554-6 |
| URL الوصول: | https://doaj.org/article/e781f62719b946b380de7daba9926da2 |
| رقم الأكسشن: | edsdoj.781f62719b946b380de7daba9926da2 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
Find this article in full text from Springer Verlag. 
Full Text Finder | تدمد: | 21938237 2193651X |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.1007/s40122-023-00554-6 |