The Utility of PET/CT Metabolic Parameters Measured Based on Fixed Percentage Threshold of SUVmax and Adaptive Iterative Algorithm in the New Revised FIGO Staging System for Stage III Cervical Cancer
التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان:
The Utility of PET/CT Metabolic Parameters Measured Based on Fixed Percentage Threshold of SUVmax and Adaptive Iterative Algorithm in the New Revised FIGO Staging System for Stage III Cervical Cancer
Objectives: The main aim of this study was to evaluate the differences in metabolic parameters of positron emission tomography with 2-deoxy-2-[fluorine-18] fluoro-D-glucose integrated with computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) measured based on fixed percentage threshold of maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) and adaptive iterative algorithm (AT-AIA) in patients with cervical cancer. Metabolic parameters in stage III patients subdivided into five groups according to FIGO and T staging (IIIB-T3B, IIIC1-T2B, IIIC1-T3B, IIIC2-T2B, IIIC2-T3B) were compared.Methods: In total, 142 patients with squamous cell cervical cancer subjected to 18F-FDG-PET/CT before treatment were retrospectively reviewed. SUVmax, mean standard uptake value (SUVmean), maximum glucose homogenization (GNmax), mean glucose homogenization (GNmean), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), and glucose homogenization total lesion glycolysis (GNTLG) values measured based on the above two measurement methods of all 142 patients (IIB-IVB) and 102 patients in the above five groups were compared.Results: MTV measured based on fixed percentage threshold of SUVmax was lower than that based on AT-AIA (p < 0.05). MTV40%, MTV0.5, TLG0.5, GNTLG40%, and GNTLG0.5 values were significantly different among the five groups (p < 0.05) while the rest parameters were comparable (p > 0.05). All metabolic parameters of group IIIB-T3B were comparable to those of the other four groups. MTV40%, MTV0.5, GNTLG40%, and GNTLG0.5 in group IIIC1-T2B relative to IIIC1-T3B and those of group IIIC2-T2B relative to group IIIC2-T3B were significantly different. All metabolic parameters of group IIIC1-T2B relative to IIIC2-T2B and those of group IIIC1-T3B relative to group IIIC2-T3B were not significantly different.Conclusion: Metabolic parameters obtained with the two measurement methods showed a number of differences. Selection of appropriate methods for measurement of 18F-FDG-PET/CT metabolic parameters is important to facilitate advances in laboratory research and clinical applications. When stage III patients had the same T stage, their metabolic parameters of local tumor were not significantly different, regardless of the presence or absence of lymph node metastasis, location of metastatic lymph nodes in the pelvic cavity or para-abdominal aorta. These results support the utility of the revised FIGO system for stage III cervical cancer, although our T-staging of stage III disease is incomplete.
Full Text Finder