دورية أكاديمية

Normalizing inconvenience to promote childhood vaccination: a qualitative implementation evaluation of a novel Michigan program

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Normalizing inconvenience to promote childhood vaccination: a qualitative implementation evaluation of a novel Michigan program
المؤلفون: Denise F. Lillvis, Charley Willison, Katia Noyes
المصدر: BMC Health Services Research, Vol 20, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2020)
بيانات النشر: BMC, 2020.
سنة النشر: 2020
المجموعة: LCC:Public aspects of medicine
مصطلحات موضوعية: Normalization process theory, Implementation, Immunization programs, Community health education, Organization and administration, County government, Public aspects of medicine, RA1-1270
الوصف: Abstract Background In 2015, Michigan implemented a rule requiring parents to attend an education session at a local health department (LHD) prior to waiving mandatory child vaccinations. This study utilizes Normalization Process Theory (NPT) to assess program implementation, identifying potential threats to fidelity and sustainability. Methods We conducted 32 semi-structured interviews with individuals involved in these education programs across 16 LHDs. Participating LHDs were selected from a stratified, representative sample. One interviewer conducted all interviews using a semi-structured interview guide; two authors coded and analyzed the interview transcripts according to the NPT framework (i.e, sense-making, engagement, collective action, and reflexive monitoring). Results There was a lack of consensus about who the stakeholders of this new rule and its resulting program were (sense-making). Perhaps as a result, most LHDs did not solicit advice from key stakeholder groups (i.e., schools, health care providers, community stakeholders) in their planning (engagement). While most interviewees identified providing education and information as the goal, some identified the more challenging goal of persuading vaccine hesitant parents to immunize their children. There was also some variation in perception of who held health educators accountable for meeting the goals of the waiver education program (collective action). Formal program evaluation by LHDs was rare, although some held informal staff debriefings. Additionally, sessions that went particularly well or poorly were top-of-mind (reflexive monitoring). Conclusions The immunization waiver education program may be at risk of not becoming fully embedded into routine LHD practice, potentially compromising its long-term effectiveness and sustainability. Managers at the local and state level should maintain oversight to ensure that the program is delivered with fidelity. As the program relies on sustaining inconvenience to encourage parents to immunize their children, any shortcuts taken will undermine its success.
نوع الوثيقة: article
وصف الملف: electronic resource
اللغة: English
تدمد: 1472-6963
Relation: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-020-05550-6; https://doaj.org/toc/1472-6963
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05550-6
URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/877e1e62d9f4401290b0285fef317e4e
رقم الأكسشن: edsdoj.877e1e62d9f4401290b0285fef317e4e
قاعدة البيانات: Directory of Open Access Journals
الوصف
تدمد:14726963
DOI:10.1186/s12913-020-05550-6