دورية أكاديمية

Exploration of understanding of impactibility analysis and application through workshops to inform model design for population health management policy: a qualitative assessment

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Exploration of understanding of impactibility analysis and application through workshops to inform model design for population health management policy: a qualitative assessment
المؤلفون: Alex Bottle, Victoria Cornelius, Andi Orlowski, Rachel Ashton, Heather Humphreys, Rukiye Forshaw, Jason Pickles, Simon Snowden
المصدر: BMJ Open, Vol 14, Iss 5 (2024)
بيانات النشر: BMJ Publishing Group, 2024.
سنة النشر: 2024
المجموعة: LCC:Medicine
مصطلحات موضوعية: Medicine
الوصف: Objectives Assess understanding of impactibility modelling definitions, benefits, challenges and approaches.Design Qualitative assessment.Setting Two workshops were developed. Workshop 1 was to consider impactibility definitions and terminology through moderated open discussion, what the potential pros and cons might be, and what factors would be best to assess. In workshop 2, participants appraised five approaches to impactibility modelling identified in the literature.Participants National Health Service (NHS) analysts, policy-makers, academics and members of non-governmental think tank organisations identified through existing networks and via a general announcement on social media. Interested participants could enrol after signing informed consent.Outcome measures Descriptive assessment of responses to gain understanding of the concept of impactibility (defining impactibility analysis), the benefits and challenges of using this type of modelling and most relevant approach to building an impactibility model for the NHS.Results 37 people attended 1 or 2 workshops in small groups (maximum 10 participants): 21 attended both workshops, 6 only workshop 1 and 10 only workshop 2. Discussions in workshop 1 illustrated that impactibility modelling is not clearly understood, with it generally being viewed as a cross-sectional way to identify patients rather than considering patients by iterative follow-up. Recurrent factors arising from workshop 2 were the shortage of benchmarks; incomplete access to/recording of primary care data and social factors (which were seen as important to understanding amenability to treatment); the need for outcome/action suggestions as well as providing the data and the risk of increasing healthcare inequality.Conclusions Understanding of impactibility modelling was poor among our workshop attendees, but it is an emerging concept for which few studies have been published. Implementation would require formal planning and training and should be performed by groups with expertise in the procurement and handling of the most relevant health-related real-world data.
نوع الوثيقة: article
وصف الملف: electronic resource
اللغة: English
تدمد: 2044-6055
Relation: https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/14/5/e067541.full; https://doaj.org/toc/2044-6055
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067541
URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/ad938cddc2494e4a96c960675f6c4200
رقم الأكسشن: edsdoj.938cddc2494e4a96c960675f6c4200
قاعدة البيانات: Directory of Open Access Journals
الوصف
تدمد:20446055
DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067541