دورية أكاديمية

Meta-analysis of dynamic contrast enhancement and diffusion-weighted MRI for differentiation of benign from malignant non-mass enhancement breast lesions

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Meta-analysis of dynamic contrast enhancement and diffusion-weighted MRI for differentiation of benign from malignant non-mass enhancement breast lesions
المؤلفون: Jing Zhang, Longchao Li, Li Zhang, Xia Zhe, Min Tang, Xiaoyan Lei, Xiaoling Zhang
المصدر: Frontiers in Oncology, Vol 14 (2024)
بيانات النشر: Frontiers Media S.A., 2024.
سنة النشر: 2024
المجموعة: LCC:Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens
مصطلحات موضوعية: non-mass enhancement lesions, meta-analysis, breast cancer, dynamic contrast enhancement, diffusion-weighted imaging, Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens, RC254-282
الوصف: PurposeThe objective of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis comparing the diagnostic efficacy of models based on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)-MRI, dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE)-MRI, and combination models (DCE and DWI) in distinguishing benign from malignant non-mass enhancement (NME) breast lesions.Materials and methodsPubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched, from inception to January 30, 2023, for studies that used DCE or DWI-MRI for the prediction of NME breast cancer patients. A bivariate random-effects model was used to calculate the meta-analytic sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) of the DCE, DWI, and combination models. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression analysis were performed to find the source of heterogeneity.ResultsOf the 838 articles screened, 18 were eligible for analysis (13 on DCE, five on DWI, and four studies reporting the diagnostic accuracy of both DCE and DWI). The funnel plot showed no publication bias (p > 0.5). The pooled sensitivity and specificity and the AUC of the DCE, DWI, and combination models were 0.58, 0.72, and 0.70, respectively; 0.84, 0.69, and 0.84, respectively; and 0.88, 0.79, 0.90, respectively. The meta-analysis found no evidence of a threshold effect and significant heterogeneity among trials in terms of DCE sensitivity and specificity, as well as DWI specificity alone (I2 > 75%). The meta-regression revealed that different diagnostic criteria contributed to the DCE study’s heterogeneity (p < 0.05). Different reference criteria significantly influenced the heterogeneity of the DWI model (p < 0.05). Subgroup analysis revealed that clustered ring enhancement (CRE) had the highest pooled specificity (0.92) among other DCE features. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) with a mean threshold
نوع الوثيقة: article
وصف الملف: electronic resource
اللغة: English
تدمد: 2234-943X
Relation: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2024.1332783/full; https://doaj.org/toc/2234-943X
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1332783
URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/de96210ff6b54ad8a31b19384bfbfb57
رقم الأكسشن: edsdoj.96210ff6b54ad8a31b19384bfbfb57
قاعدة البيانات: Directory of Open Access Journals
الوصف
تدمد:2234943X
DOI:10.3389/fonc.2024.1332783