دورية أكاديمية
أعرض في EDS

Total Joint Arthroplasty at a Novel 'Hyperspecialty' Ambulatory Surgical Center With Extended Care Suites is as Safe as Inpatient Arthroplasty

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Total Joint Arthroplasty at a Novel 'Hyperspecialty' Ambulatory Surgical Center With Extended Care Suites is as Safe as Inpatient Arthroplasty
المؤلفون: Graham S. Goh, MD, Taylor D’Amore, MD, P. Maxwell Courtney, MD, William J. Hozack, MD, Chad A. Krueger, MD
المصدر: Arthroplasty Today, Vol 16, Iss , Pp 242-246.e1 (2022)
بيانات النشر: Elsevier, 2022.
سنة النشر: 2022
المجموعة: LCC:Orthopedic surgery
مصطلحات موضوعية: Outpatient, Ambulatory, Knee arthroplasty, Hip arthroplasty, Outcomes, Safety, Orthopedic surgery, RD701-811
الوصف: Background: New “hyperspecialty” ambulatory surgical centers (HASCs) have been introduced to deliver safe and cost-efficient care, allowing patients to spend additional nights in an extended care suite before discharge. This study compared the 90-day complications and readmissions of total joint arthroplasty (TJA) at an HASC and inpatient TJA at a tertiary hospital. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 1365 primary, unilateral, TJAs (658 total hip arthroplasty, 707 total knee arthroplasty) performed at 4 HASCs in 2017-2021. Following their outpatient procedure, patients were discharged to an extended care suite staffed full-time by nurses and physical therapists. These patients were matched 1:1 with 1365 inpatient TJAs (628 total hip arthroplasty, 737 total knee arthroplasty) based on demographics, joint, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score. Ninety-day complications and readmissions were compared. Results: The mean age was 60.0 ± 9.8 years and 59.4 ± 8.1 years in the inpatient and outpatient groups, respectively (P = .106). There was no difference in ASA≥3 patients (16.4% vs 17.7%; P = .387) and operative time (86.9 ± 31.8 vs 88.7 ± 27.9 minutes; P = .118). Five patients (0.4%) in the outpatient group were transferred to an acute hospital. When comparing 90-day outcomes between the inpatient and outpatient groups, there was no difference in pulmonary embolism (0.1% vs 0.0%; P = .317), mechanical complications (0.3% vs 0.7%; P = .165), periprosthetic joint infections (0.5% vs 1.1%; P = .092), or readmissions (1.2% vs 1.5%; P = .513). A subgroup analysis of ASA≥3 patients yielded similar findings. Conclusions: Patients undergoing outpatient TJA at a novel HASC had similar complication and readmission rates as those undergoing TJA at a tertiary hospital. Based on these data, such facilities seem appropriate for the care of outpatient TJA patients with ASA
نوع الوثيقة: article
وصف الملف: electronic resource
اللغة: English
تدمد: 2352-3441
66839440
Relation: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344122001182; https://doaj.org/toc/2352-3441
DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2022.05.005
URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/9e98dc668394404b907323d9d8d28bc7
رقم الأكسشن: edsdoj.9e98dc668394404b907323d9d8d28bc7
قاعدة البيانات: Directory of Open Access Journals
الوصف
تدمد:23523441
66839440
DOI:10.1016/j.artd.2022.05.005