دورية أكاديمية
Differences among [18F]FDG PET-derived parameters in lung cancer produced by three software packages
العنوان: | Differences among [18F]FDG PET-derived parameters in lung cancer produced by three software packages |
---|---|
المؤلفون: | Agnieszka Bos-Liedke, Paulina Cegla, Krzysztof Matuszewski, Ewelina Konstanty, Adam Piotrowski, Magdalena Gross, Julian Malicki, Maciej Kozak |
المصدر: | Scientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2021) |
بيانات النشر: | Nature Portfolio, 2021. |
سنة النشر: | 2021 |
المجموعة: | LCC:Medicine LCC:Science |
مصطلحات موضوعية: | Medicine, Science |
الوصف: | Abstract Investigation of differences in derived [18F]FDG PET metabolic and volumetric parameters among three different software programs in lung cancer. A retrospective analysis was performed on a group of 98 lung cancer patients who underwent a baseline [18F]FDG PET/CT study. To assess appropriate delineation methods, the NEMA phantom study was first performed using the following software: Philips EBW (Extended Brilliance Workstation), MIM Software and Rover. Based on this study, the best cut-off methods (dependent on tumour size) were selected, extracted and applied for lung cancer delineation. Several semiquantitative [18F]FDG parameters (SUVmax, SUVmean, TLG and MTV) were assessed and compared among the three software programs. The parameters were assessed based on body weight (BW), lean body mass (LBM) and Bq/mL. Statistically significant differences were found in SUVmean (LBM) between MIM Software and Rover (4.62 ± 2.15 vs 4.84 ± 1.20; p |
نوع الوثيقة: | article |
وصف الملف: | electronic resource |
اللغة: | English |
تدمد: | 2045-2322 |
Relation: | https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322 |
DOI: | 10.1038/s41598-021-93436-w |
URL الوصول: | https://doaj.org/article/9fb5b17575a844b5af15c3da8e60c0eb |
رقم الأكسشن: | edsdoj.9fb5b17575a844b5af15c3da8e60c0eb |
قاعدة البيانات: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
تدمد: | 20452322 |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.1038/s41598-021-93436-w |