دورية أكاديمية

MRSA prevalence in european healthcare settings: a review

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: MRSA prevalence in european healthcare settings: a review
المؤلفون: Schablon Anja, Peters Claudia, Haamann Frank, Dulon Madeleine, Nienhaus Albert
المصدر: BMC Infectious Diseases, Vol 11, Iss 1, p 138 (2011)
بيانات النشر: BMC, 2011.
سنة النشر: 2011
المجموعة: LCC:Infectious and parasitic diseases
مصطلحات موضوعية: Infectious and parasitic diseases, RC109-216
الوصف: Abstract Background During the past two decades, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has become increasingly common as a source of nosocomial infections. Most studies of MRSA surveillance were performed during outbreaks, so that results are not applicable to settings in which MRSA is endemic. This paper gives an overview of MRSA prevalence in hospitals and other healthcare institutions in non-outbreak situations in Western Europe. Methods A keyword search was conducted in the Medline database (2000 through June 2010). Titles and abstracts were screened to identify studies on MRSA prevalence in patients in non-outbreak situations in European healthcare facilities. Each study was assessed using seven quality criteria (outcome definition, time unit, target population, participants, observer bias, screening procedure, swabbing sites) and categorized as 'good', 'fair', or 'poor'. Results 31 observational studies were included in the review. Four of the studies were of good quality. Surveillance screening of MRSA was performed in long-term care (11 studies) and acute care (20 studies). Prevalence rates varied over a wide range, from less than 1% to greater than 20%. Prevalence in the acute care and long-term care settings was comparable. The prevalence of MRSA was expressed in various ways - the percentage of MRSA among patients (range between 1% and 24%), the percentage of MRSA among S. aureus isolates (range between 5% and 54%), and as the prevalence density (range between 0.4 and 4 MRSA cases per 1,000 patient days). The screening policy differed with respect to time points (on admission or during hospital stay), selection criteria (all admissions or patients at high risk for MRSA) and anatomical sampling sites. Conclusions This review underlines the methodological differences between studies of MRSA surveillance. For comparisons between different healthcare settings, surveillance methods and outcome calculations should be standardized.
نوع الوثيقة: article
وصف الملف: electronic resource
اللغة: English
تدمد: 1471-2334
Relation: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/11/138; https://doaj.org/toc/1471-2334
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-11-138
URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/b210b600c38b457e805a95564fcaee9a
رقم الأكسشن: edsdoj.b210b600c38b457e805a95564fcaee9a
قاعدة البيانات: Directory of Open Access Journals
الوصف
تدمد:14712334
DOI:10.1186/1471-2334-11-138