دورية أكاديمية

Large common bile duct stones in high-risk elderly patients: Immediate endoscopic stone removal or elective stone removal? A single-center retrospective study

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Large common bile duct stones in high-risk elderly patients: Immediate endoscopic stone removal or elective stone removal? A single-center retrospective study
المؤلفون: Ke Meng, Da-ya Zhang, De-xin Chen, Wen-jing Liu, Kai-xuan Fang, Shengxin Chen, Lang Wu, Ming-yang Li
المصدر: BMC Gastroenterology, Vol 23, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2023)
بيانات النشر: BMC, 2023.
سنة النشر: 2023
المجموعة: LCC:Diseases of the digestive system. Gastroenterology
مصطلحات موضوعية: Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic retrograde, High-risk, Elderly, Immediate stone removal, Elective stone removal, Diseases of the digestive system. Gastroenterology, RC799-869
الوصف: Abstract Background and objective For high-risk elderly patients with chronic diseases, endoscopic stone removal for large common bile duct stones is associated with a high risk of adverse events and incomplete stone removal. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the treatment strategy of short-term biliary plastic stent placement followed by elective endoscopic stone removal is more effective and safer than immediate endoscopic stone removal. Methods The data of 262 high-risk elderly patients who received endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for large common bile duct (CBD) stones from 2017 to 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into group A (immediate stone removal) and group B (stent drainage + elective stone removal). The baseline data of the 2 groups were matched 1:1 by propensity score matching. The stone clearance rate, ERCP procedure time, total hospital stay, and procedure-related adverse events were compared between the matched groups. In group B, stone size before and after stent placement, hospital stay, procedure time and adverse events of two ERCPs were compared. Results A total of 57 pairs of patients were successfully matched between the 2 groups. The stone clearance rate in group B was higher than that in group A (89.5% vs. 75.3, P = 0.049). The total hospital stay in group B was longer than that in group A (11.86 ± 3.912 d vs. 19.14 ± 3.176 d, P
نوع الوثيقة: article
وصف الملف: electronic resource
اللغة: English
تدمد: 1471-230X
Relation: https://doaj.org/toc/1471-230X
DOI: 10.1186/s12876-023-02976-0
URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/aba9334fb3854067808e6a0714b4c66d
رقم الأكسشن: edsdoj.ba9334fb3854067808e6a0714b4c66d
قاعدة البيانات: Directory of Open Access Journals
الوصف
تدمد:1471230X
DOI:10.1186/s12876-023-02976-0