دورية أكاديمية

New SOA Treatments Within the Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM): Strong Production and Sinks Govern Atmospheric SOA Distributions and Radiative Forcing

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: New SOA Treatments Within the Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM): Strong Production and Sinks Govern Atmospheric SOA Distributions and Radiative Forcing
المؤلفون: Sijia Lou, Manish Shrivastava, Richard C. Easter, Yang Yang, Po‐Lun Ma, Hailong Wang, Michael J. Cubison, Pedro Campuzano‐Jost, Jose L. Jimenez, Qi Zhang, Philip J. Rasch, John E. Shilling, Alla Zelenyuk, Manvendra Dubey, Philip Cameron‐Smith, Scot T. Martin, Johannes Schneider, Christiane Schulz
المصدر: Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol 12, Iss 12, Pp n/a-n/a (2020)
بيانات النشر: American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2020.
سنة النشر: 2020
المجموعة: LCC:Physical geography
LCC:Oceanography
مصطلحات موضوعية: secondary organic aerosol, photolytic removal, fragmentation reaction, Physical geography, GB3-5030, Oceanography, GC1-1581
الوصف: Abstract Secondary organic aerosols (SOA) are large contributors to fine particle mass loading and number concentration and interact with clouds and radiation. Several processes affect the formation, chemical transformation, and removal of SOA in the atmosphere. For computational efficiency, global models use simplified SOA treatments, which often do not capture the dynamics of SOA formation. Here we test more complex SOA treatments within the global Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM) to investigate how simulated SOA spatial distributions respond to some of the important but uncertain processes affecting SOA formation, removal, and lifetime. We evaluate model predictions with a suite of surface, aircraft, and satellite observations that span the globe and the full troposphere. Simulations indicate that both a strong production (achieved here by multigenerational aging of SOA precursors that includes moderate functionalization) and a strong sink of SOA (especially in the middle upper troposphere, achieved here by adding particle‐phase photolysis) are needed to reproduce the vertical distribution of organic aerosol (OA) measured during several aircraft field campaigns; without this sink, the simulated middle upper tropospheric OA is too large. Our results show that variations in SOA chemistry formulations change SOA wet removal lifetime by a factor of 3 due to changes in horizontal and vertical distributions of SOA. In all the SOA chemistry formulations tested here, an efficient chemical sink, that is, particle‐phase photolysis, was needed to reproduce the aircraft measurements of OA at high altitudes. Globally, SOA removal rates by photolysis are equal to the wet removal sink, and photolysis decreases SOA lifetimes from 10 to ~3 days. A recent review of multiple field studies found no increase in net OA formation over and downwind biomass burning regions, so we also tested an alternative, empirical SOA treatment that increases primary organic aerosol (POA) emissions near source region and converts POA to SOA with an aging time scale of 1 day. Although this empirical treatment performs surprisingly well in simulating OA loadings near the surface, it overestimates OA loadings in the middle and upper troposphere compared to aircraft measurements, likely due to strong convective transport to high altitudes where wet removal is weak. The default improved model formulation (multigenerational aging with moderate fragmentation and photolysis) performs much better than the empirical treatment in these regions. Differences in SOA treatments greatly affect the SOA direct radiative effect, which ranges from −0.65 (moderate fragmentation and photolysis) to −2 W m−2 (moderate fragmentation without photolysis). Notably, most SOA formulations predict similar global indirect forcing of SOA calculated as the difference in cloud forcing between present‐day and preindustrial simulations.
نوع الوثيقة: article
وصف الملف: electronic resource
اللغة: English
تدمد: 1942-2466
Relation: https://doaj.org/toc/1942-2466
DOI: 10.1029/2020MS002266
URL الوصول: https://doaj.org/article/f05ad943cfb14cf18a87b6f2f1c51cf8
رقم الأكسشن: edsdoj.f05ad943cfb14cf18a87b6f2f1c51cf8
قاعدة البيانات: Directory of Open Access Journals
الوصف
تدمد:19422466
DOI:10.1029/2020MS002266